Torque vectoring:why does the inside front wheel also have same torque

  • Thread starter Thread starter marellasunny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque Wheel
AI Thread Summary
Torque vectoring primarily distributes power to enhance vehicle handling during turns, with a focus on the rear wheels. In high-performance all-wheel-drive systems, the front wheels often receive equal torque to maintain stability and prevent torque steer, especially in front-wheel-drive vehicles. Open differentials typically provide a 50/50 torque split, which is effective for everyday driving conditions but can lead to power loss in low-traction scenarios. Limited-slip differentials are more beneficial in low-traction situations, allowing for better torque distribution and reducing understeer. Overall, the design choices in torque vectoring systems aim to balance performance and drivability under various conditions.
marellasunny
Messages
245
Reaction score
3
My question relates to torque vectoring during a turn(high speed). Wikipedia says torque vectoring is mainly done on the rear wheels during a turn. The front wheels receive the same amount of torque though. Why do the front wheels receive the same amount of torque during a turn?

Say my engine produces 500Nm torque. My centre differential distributes it 60% to the rear(=300Nm) and 40% to the front(=200Nm). Say also,my front and rear axle differentials multiply the torque by 3 times.

So,if I am turning left,my rear right wheel gets a torque of 900Nm after torque vectoring(the rear left wheel is at 0Nm). But,according to the videos and wikipedia,the front wheels are each at 300Nm. Why? [I think this promotes understeer].

Please have a look at this diagram from Nissan Juke taking a left turn,the front wheels are each at 25%:http://www.nissan.co.za/en/web/models/JUKE/Performance/images/1365681727649049510.jpg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In the absence of any special techniques or fancy differentials (and most AWD cars do not have a limited slip diff on the front wheels), an open differential will always provide a 50-50 torque split. As for why this is done? Because it is simple, and in most cases, a fancy front diff on an all wheel drive car provides little benefit. On a front-wheel drive car, the answer is quite different - many high performance FWD cars do have specialized differentials that carefully control the torque going to each wheel in a turn.
 
One other point is that having unequal torque on the front wheels is unpleasant to drive because it causes torque steer.
 
Here is my understanding.

There are only 2 types of differential: open or limited-slip. Both divide power to each wheel.

The open diff transfer the power from one wheel to another by varying the wheel rpm (increasing one, reducing the other). So, as said previously, the torque output is always 50/50, even if the power isn't the same.

This is the best setup for typical driving, as wheel rpm is different from left to right when taking a turn. Not adjusting the rpm would mean losses as some dragging would be involved while taking a turn. As an added bonus, the open diff is the most economical one to build.

But when you have different traction characteristics from left to right, the one having the lowest coefficient of friction may start to slip and hence waste power (to the point of losing it all, if the other wheel has stopped rotating).

The only way to solve that problem is to lock the right and left axles together. The best way is to do it by some friction mechanism, thus the limited-slip diff. The friction may comes from clutches, cones, worm gears (Torsen) or even the brake system and it may be preset or computer controlled; still it has the same effect in the end and that friction power represents a loss.

In the extreme case of having a completely locked diff, one can see that both wheels have the same rpm, so the only option for transferring power from one wheel to another is to transfer torque. If one wheel is not touching the ground, then it is easy to understand that the full power goes to the wheel that touches the ground even if both wheel are rotating. This is obviously the best setup for a limited traction situation, preferably in a straight path.

Now to address the present problem. AWD like the ones the OP talks about are usually designed to be mostly FWD, sending power to the rear wheels only when traction is weak. First of all, we can note that having a torque difference on front-wheel-steered FWD vehicles may induce torque-steer.

So, the front diff should be an open diff (50/50) since it is mostly used for everyday, no-traction-problem, situations. When you loose traction, then you switch to AWD. And because you know your in a low traction situation, making the rear diff a limited-slip one makes sense, since it is always used in low-traction situations.

As for the understeer problem stated in the OP, sending the power to the rear wheels in a low traction situation is done exactly for that: reducing understeer.

http://www.autos.ca/auto-tech/auto-tech-limited-slip-vs-torque-vectoring/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/news/4225886
http://torque-vectoring.belisso.com/
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Back
Top