Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution

  • Thread starter Thread starter arccosinus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distribution
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, specifically how to demonstrate that less than 50% of oxygen molecules at temperature T have kinetic energy greater than 3kT/2. The formula for the distribution is provided, along with the calculation for the mean squared velocity and average kinetic energy. A proposed method involves creating a new distribution based on v^2 and comparing integrals, but concerns about its complexity and convergence are raised. Participants are seeking a simpler argument or explanation regarding the area under the normalized Boltzmann distribution curve. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in understanding kinetic energy distribution among gas particles.
arccosinus
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have a question regarding the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.

As you know, the distribution basically looks like
n(v) = constant \cdot v^2e^{-\frac{mv^2}{2kT}}
, where v is the speed, m is the particle mass, is k the Boltzmann constant and T is the absolute temperature.

Now, one can calculate the mean value of the squared velocity <v^2> by evaluating the integral
\frac{\int_0^\infty v^2 n(v) dv}{\int_0^\infty n(v) dv} = \frac{3kT}{m}

From here, we can calculate the average (translational-)kinetic energy of particles,
<\frac{mv^2}{2}> = \frac{m}{2} <v^2>=\frac{3kT}{2}

Here comes the question, say we have air of temperature T. How can one easily show that the fraction of (for example) oxygen molecules with kinetic energy greater than \frac{3kT}{2} is less than 50%?

My idea is basically to create a new distribution, say n_1(v^2) by substituting v with v^2 in the original distribution, integrating from 0 to \frac{3kT}{m} and then from \frac{3kT}{m} to infinity. One can then compare these integrals and conclude whether the fraction of molecules with kinetic energy greater than \frac{3kT}{2} is less than 50%. However, this approach seems extremely superflous and I am not even sure the integrals converge (even though I think so). There has to be an easier argument! Can anyone help please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does the area under the normalized Boltzmann distribution curve (say between v1 and v2) tell you ?
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...

Similar threads

Back
Top