Derivation of De Broglie wavelength

PhiJ
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
The De Broglie wavelength was derived like this by our physics teacher.
E=hf v=fλ E=mc^2
so
hf=mc^2
hv=λmc^2
Then the WRONG BIT
h=λmv
h=λρ
λ=h/ρ

But that only works for light (when c=v). There must be a correct way of deriving it for electrons etc. We are expected to use this for electrons.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhiJ said:
The De Broglie wavelength was derived like this by our physics teacher.
E=hf v=fλ E=mc^2
so
hf=mc^2
hv=λmc^2
Then the WRONG BIT
h=λmv
h=λρ
λ=h/ρ
But that only works for light (when c=v). There must be a correct way of deriving it for electrons etc. We are expected to use this for electrons.

It only works if you take: wave-speed = \frac{c^2}{v}[/tex] where v is the physical<br /> speed of the electron, this is however an ad-hoc assumption here. It&#039;s not<br /> that hard to derive λ=h/ρ directly from E=hf but it takes Special Relativity:<br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.chip-architect.com/physics/deBroglie.pdf" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">http://www.chip-architect.com/physics/deBroglie.pdf</a>Regards, Hans
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
Back
Top