Finding the angle of an inclined plane

AI Thread Summary
A 1900 kg car experiences a consistent force of air resistance and friction while traveling at 27 m/s, requiring an additional 47 hp (or 35060 Watts) to maintain speed going uphill compared to downhill. The user attempts to calculate the incline angle using power and force equations but finds conflicting results, yielding angles of less than 1° and about 2°. There is confusion regarding the interpretation of the variable 'P' and the setup of the force equations. Clarifications suggest that 'P' represents power and that the equations must reflect the correct signs for forces. The discussion highlights the complexities in solving for the incline angle and the need for precise equation formulation.
scimanyd
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This should be an easy question, but I am having problems with my conflicting solutions. Maybe someone could help.

A 1900 kg car experiences a combined force of air resistance and friction that has the same magnitude whether the car goes up or down the hill at 27 m/s. Going up a hill, the car's engine needs to produce 47 hp more power to sustain the constant velocity than it does going down the same hill. At what angle is the hill inclined above the horizontal?

My approach:

First P=Fv ... so I sub in Force =Power/velocity
and then set up my force equations in the x direction which I set parallel to the inclined plane.

Assuming Power up = power down + 47hp(or 35060Watts)

UP: P/v - sinθmg - (friction+air resistance) = 0
DOWN: (P+47hp)/v + sinθmg - (friction+air resistance) = 0

I tried setting these two equations equal to each other and I come up with theta <1°
I tried solving for P in one and then subbing into the other and solving for Theta and I get theta = about 2°.
Still this seams unreasonably low, I wouldn't think that it would take 47hp more to go up a 2° incline
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you specify what the variable 'P' is supposed to represent? Also, are you sure that the first term in both of your expressions makes sense?
 
Yes, P stands for power
I substituted P/v in for my applied force, since power = Force*velocity
I should be allowed to make the sub.

the equations simplified: Force - weight(portion along x axis) - Friction = 0 ... (constant velocity tells me that the equation is in equalibrium)
 
In second equation instead of
P+47 you had to write P-47

enjoy
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top