Moment of Inertia (Atwood's Machine)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the linear acceleration of block B in Atwood's Machine, given the masses of blocks A and B, the moment of inertia of the wheel, and the radius of the semicircle. The user starts by applying Newton's laws and sets up equations involving tensions and accelerations. Guidance is provided to recognize that both blocks share the same acceleration due to the taut string. The key to solving the problem lies in eliminating the tension variables by using torque relationships and the constraint that relates angular and linear acceleration. The conversation emphasizes the importance of simplifying the equations to find the desired expression for acceleration.
garyljc
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Question : The masses of blocks A and B are given M_a and M_b , respectively, the moment of inertia of the wheel about its axis is I , and the radius of the semicircle in which the string moves is R. Assume that there is no slippage between the wheel and the string.
Also M_a > M_b

a.) Find an expression for the magnitude of the linear acceleration of block B in terms of the linear acceleration a_a ( acceleration of block A ) .

My attempt :
Using Newton's law of motion
we have
g.M_a - T1 = M_a . a_a
T2 - g.M_b = M_b. a_b , where a_b is the acceleration of block B
and torque of the pulley : T1.R - T2.R = I (alpha) , where alpha is the angular acceleration

Am I heading the right direction? If so, how could i eliminate both tensions T1 and T2 to get what the question wants ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
garyljc said:
Am I heading the right direction? If so, how could i eliminate both tensions T1 and T2 to get what the question wants ?

You're almost there but like all classical Newton's problems you need some constraints to get you all the way there.

Currently you have too many unknown variables, but a couple statements can help you out.

1) The system as a whole (that is block A and block B) move together (assuming a taught string) and so aa = ab = a

2) You will need a constraint that eliminates \alpha with a classical relation to acceleration and radius. I believe, (but am not positive) you can use \alpha= a/r

Now as for getting rid of your tensions, if you re-arrange your torque equation to look like this: \tau net = (T1 - T2)r = I\alpha, then you can see that a simple subtraction of your first two equations can be used to substitute the tensions away.

-eq1 - eq2 => (T1 - T2) + (Mbg - Mag) = (-Ma - Mb)a

you can then solve for your (T1 - T2) term and plug it into equation 3. All should work out. Hope this helps,

cheers
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top