Question regarding Curl and Cross Product

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the curl in vector calculus and the cross product of the del operator with a vector. The original poster notes a difference in the determinants used in the standard cross product formula versus the curl, specifically mentioning the use of i + j + k for curl. A clarification is provided regarding the determinants, highlighting that while the cofactors are consistent, the order of terms can lead to confusion. The Wikipedia page on curl is referenced, noting a potential misunderstanding due to the arrangement of terms in the formula. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the clarification, enhancing understanding of the curl's computation.
bitrex
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
I'm studying vector calculus, and have a question about the curl and its relation to a cross product of the del operator and a vector. When doing a standard cross product as the formula I have i(det1) - j(det2) + k(det3), where det1, 2 3 are the appropriate 2x2 determinants. However for the curl it's the same determinants, but i + j + k. I'm wondering what the reason for the difference is?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think you are right in your assertion. Curl operates like any other cross product, and the method of cofactors operates the same way.

Looking at the wikipedia page for curl though, you might get confused by the formula given as it has 3 +s, but notice that the order of the ad-bc is switched in front of the j to bc-ad.
 
Ah, I see what I missed now. Thanks for pointing that out.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top