Nitration of Benzene w/ H2SO4 & HNO3 at 55°C

  • Thread starter Thread starter cyt91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Catalyst
AI Thread Summary
In the nitration of benzene using concentrated H2SO4 and HNO3 at 55°C, concentrated sulfuric acid acts as a catalyst while also removing water, which shifts the reaction equilibrium to favor product formation. Although it catalyzes the reaction, sulfuric acid becomes diluted over time, potentially affecting its catalytic ability. While it is technically not consumed in the reaction mechanism, its dilution can halt the reaction if not in excess. The discussion highlights the complexity of defining catalysts in chemical reactions. Overall, sulfuric acid's role in this nitration process illustrates the nuanced nature of chemical definitions and reactions.
cyt91
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
In the nitration of benzene using conc. H2SO4 and HNO3 at 55 degrees celsius, is concentrated H2SO4 a catalyst for the reaction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a border case for me.

Write reaction equation.

You start with concentrated acid, does it stay concentrated?
 
This is a little bit more complicated.

Concentrated sulfuric acid serves two purposes. First, as an acid it catalyzes the reaction. However, it also removes water from the HNO3/benzene pair, shifting reaction equilibrium to the right. In the process it gets more and more diluted and at some moment it is no longer able to catalyze the process. By definition catalyst is not consumed, obviously in this case it is not entirely true.
 
But in the mechanism...isn't sulphuric acid regenerated? So sulphuric acid is not consumed.
 
In the mechanism - yes. But if you run the reaction acid gets diluted, so if it wasn't in a large excess reaction will stop. There is no error in calling it a catalyst when applying simple and rigid definition of catalyst. Unfortunately, chemistry hates simple and rigid definitions, and you can be sure almost always you will find a system that doesn't fit.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top