Beam depth or column size factor in loading

AI Thread Summary
The relationship between beam depth and column size is crucial in structural engineering, particularly under uniform loading conditions. Increasing beam depth while keeping column size constant can enhance load-bearing capacity, but this approach depends on the specific dead and live loads involved. Taller columns may buckle under excessive loads, while shorter columns risk spalding, highlighting the importance of proper sizing. The self-weight of beams also plays a significant role in determining the overall structure's capacity. Ultimately, the choice between adjusting beam depth or column size should be based on the specific loading requirements and structural design considerations.
rodsika
Messages
278
Reaction score
2
I just want to know the relationship between beam depth and column size. I know there is a relationship. But in uniform loading, do they increase beam depth or column size? or rather.. would increasing beam depth and keeping column constant be able to handle more load? or should the beam depth be constant and the column size increased to handle more load given the storey or building height is constant?

I'm not building anything. Just want an idea. Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It really depends on how much dead load needs to be supported, and what/how live loads would affect the structure. For example, if you were testing concrete columns with a fixed width/cross-section, taller columns will likely buckle, and shorter columns will likely develop spalding under too much load. Also, it depends on the self-weight of the beams being used. If you need longer spans with fewer columns, you might think about castellating the beams, but that has its advantages and drawbacks with changes in moment and shear capacities respectively.
 
Thread 'I need a concave mirror with a focal length length of 150 feet'
I need to cut down a 3 year old dead tree from top down so tree causes no damage with small pieces falling. I need a mirror with a focal length of 150 ft. 12" diameter to 36" diameter will work good but I can't think of any easy way to build it. Nothing like this for sale on Ebay. I have a 30" Fresnel lens that I use to burn stumps it works great. Tree service wants $2000.
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Back
Top