Question on Fermat's Last Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wiz14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Wiz14
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
According to Fermat's last theorem, a 6th power plus a 6th power cannot equal a 6th power, but a square plus a square can equal a square. But can't 6th powers be written as squares of 3rd powers? Also, can't any even powers be written as squares?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wiz14 said:
But can't 6th powers be written as squares of 3rd powers? Also, can't any even powers be written as squares?

Yes, they can be written as such. Not really sure what you're getting at...
 
micromass said:
Yes, they can be written as such. Not really sure what you're getting at...

Is this a way to know what numbers cannot be pythagorean triples? for example:
a2 + b2 = c2
cannot have integer solutions if a,b, and c are perfect squares, cubes, fourth powers, etc?
 
Wiz14 said:
Is this a way to know what numbers cannot be pythagorean triples?

We know what all the pythagorean triples are. You don't need FLT for this.
 
Wiz14 said:
According to Fermat's last theorem, a 6th power plus a 6th power cannot equal a 6th power, but a square plus a square can equal a square. But can't 6th powers be written as squares of 3rd powers? Also, can't any even powers be written as squares?
Well yes even powers can be written as squares, but only certain pairs of squares sum to a square. FLT which has been proven states that x^y + y^n = z^n has no solution in integers. Thus, for n > 2 including n equal to an even number greater than 2 there is no solution.

P.S. it has been shown that all solutions of the form x^2 + y^2 = z^2 are such that the pair x and y are of the form a^2 - b^2 and 2ab for some a and b, but a^2 - b^2 can never equal a cube except in the case |a| = 3 and |b| = 1. However, in that case 2ab = +/- 6 which is not a cube. Thus 8^2 + 6^2 = 10^2 has the property that 8 is cube. Although all even cubes are of the form 2ab, no two cubes sum to a square except in the trival cases where the square is 0 or one of the cubes is 0, i.e. a=b=k^3 or either of (a,b) = 0 in which case the common requirement that a is coprime to b is missing.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...

Similar threads

Back
Top