Calorimetry question (unaccounted heat loss)

AI Thread Summary
Unaccounted heat loss during an acid-base neutralization reaction leads to inaccuracies in the reported enthalpy of neutralization, as the heat released is not fully captured by the calorimeter. If heat dissipates quickly, the thermometer may not register the full temperature change, resulting in a lower calculated enthalpy value. This discrepancy occurs because the measurement tools themselves can introduce errors, affecting the analysis of the reaction. Additionally, using a glass calorimeter, which conducts heat better than a styrofoam cup, may result in even greater heat loss, further skewing results. Overall, these factors highlight the challenges in accurately measuring enthalpy changes in calorimetry experiments.
FLgirl
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
1. An acid-base neutralization reaction is exothermic. For the measurement of the enthalpy of neutralization, for the reaction, heat is inevitably lost to the calorimeter (beaker or styrofoam cup). How will this unaccounted for heat loss affect the reported value for the enthalpy of neautralization for the reaction?



2. enthalpy (heat) of neutralization = heat released by neutralization reaction / moles of acid or base that react



3. The Attempt at a Solution ..I'm stumped, I need someone smarter than me to explain this to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine the heat is lost so fast you don't observe a temperature change inside the calorimeter. What would be the determined enthalpy of neutralization?
 
Considering you didn't answer my question... how does that explain anything?
 
It does. If you don't see how, please answer and I will try to guide you to the moment when you will understand.
 
Think about your tools... the thermometer itself has to react in order to measure the temperature change. If it's measurement is off (as all measurements are), then how will that affect your analysis of what's happening?

If you've actually lost 10 units, but your measurement is showing that you lost 8 units, how will that affect your calculations?
 
ps.:
1. Will the recorded temperature change for an exothermic reaction performed in a glass calorimeter be greater or less than that in a styrofoam coffee cup calorimeter? Assume glass to be a better conductor of heat than styrofoam.
If glass is a better conductor, then heat will move through it faster, right? If more heat leaves rather than being measured by the thermometer, then... ?

By the way, I hate these questions. They're dumb, because this is stuff that you'll come to realize on your own. This crap is just teachers trying to come up with something to trip up some students to prevent everyone from getting good grades. It's dumb.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top