What is the Effect of Distributed Mass on the Time Period of a Spring?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time period of a spring with distributed mass, specifically when a mass 'M' is hung from a spring with spring constant 'K'. The user proposes dividing the spring into 'n' massless springs, leading to a derived total extension formula that suggests an effective mass of M/2. However, it is pointed out that assuming the effective mass for static extension applies to dynamic oscillations is incorrect. The oscillations will form standing waves, and the analysis for this scenario is more complex than for a lumped mass system. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate calculations.
ShakyAsh
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Okay, so I've been trying to figure out what would be the time period of spring of mass 'M' & spring constant K which is hung vertically from a ceiling.

Dividing the spring into n equal massless springs of spring constant k=nK which are connected to each other by n small objects of mass m=M/n like this-
_____
n | (k)
m
:
:
3 | (k)
m
2 | (k)
m
1 | (k)
m​
Now, extension in first spring
Δx1=mg/k
Similarly,
Δx2=2mg/k
...
Δxn=n mg/k
ΔX(Total)=ƩΔx=mg n(n+1)/2k
Putting values of m and k
ΔX=Mg n(n+1)/2Kn^2

Taking the limit n→∞
ΔX=Mg/2K which corresponds to an effective mass of M/2 rather than M/3 as given in Wikipedia & other websites.

I would be grateful if someone would be able to explain what i am doing wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what you are doing wrong is to assume that the effective mass of the spring for static extension (equilibrium) is also the effective mass for the dynamic case (oscillations).

The oscillations of a spring with distributed mass will be in the form of standing (stationary) waves. The case you are probably interested in is the fundamental mode. The mathematics is more complicated than for a lumped mass on a massless spring.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top