Fluid mechanics: defition of shear flow [rate of deformation tensor]

AI Thread Summary
Shear flow in fluid mechanics is defined by the rate of deformation tensor having only off-diagonal elements, indicating a pure shear condition. The diagonal elements correspond to the partial derivatives of velocity components in their respective directions, while off-diagonal elements represent shear rates. In the provided velocity field, the trigonometric functions do not directly determine shear flow but influence the spatial variation of velocity components. For a flow to be classified as shear flow, the diagonal elements must be zero, confirming that the flow is purely shear. Understanding these concepts is essential for mastering fluid mechanics in chemical engineering.
kd215
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
fluid mechanics: defition of "shear flow" [rate of deformation tensor]

I'm studying old undergraduate chemical engineering notes for an exam in grad school. Can't recall what this really means, can anyone explain to me what "off-diagonal elements" means and why the trig function velocities would be or not be "off-diagonal elements". And can you explain what the question is talking about in general.

Problem statement: Consider the velocity field u = ([/x],[/y],[/z]), where: [/x](x,y,z)=constant*y*z*sin(constant*x)...(similar functions for y and z velocities)

and question: "Recall that the definition of "shear flow" is one for which the rate of deformation tensor [Δ][/ij] has only off-diagonal elements. Is this shear flow?" (y or n)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


And those are velocities like u (sub x,y,z) just in each direction. Not sure how to write the notation in the posts
 


If you are a chemical engineer, your first step should be to go back to Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot, and look up the definition of the rate of deformation tensor. The components of the rate of deformation tensor in cartesian coordinates can be arranged in a 3x3 matrix. The diagonal elements of this matrix are equal to the partial derivatives of the three velocity components with respect to distance in the coordinate direction of the velocity components. If these three components of the matrix are equal to zero, the flow is considered to be a pure shear flow. The rate of deformation tensor does not specifically relate to the trigonometric functions, although, for a particular flow in which the spatial variation of the velocity components are expressed in terms of the trigonometric functions, they will of course come into play.
 


Welcome to Physics Forums, KD215.

As regards to your queries about posting in the forum, you have obviously noticed the quick symbols on the right of the edit box.

Have you also seen the formatting option icons on the toolbar above the box?

Subscript and superscript can be accessed from the X2 and X2 icons.

A wider range of maths and other symbols are available by clicking on the Ʃ at the end.

This forum recognises a form of typographical language or input called LaTex. You access this in a wisywig mode by obtainign a free or commercial program to enter it directly.
I (try to) use Mathtype.

As regards the technical part of your question. There are several mechanical properties that have the principal or normal property as diagonal elements of their matrix or tensor and other properties (parallel or cross products) as off diagonal. Examples as Inertia, stress, strain, displacement.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top