Beam bending, overhang with 2 concentrated loads

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the central deflection of a beam supported at two locations with two equal loads at the endpoints. Participants analyze the bending moment equations, M(x), and the integration process to derive the deflection formula. There is a focus on ensuring the correct determination of moments along the beam, with some confusion about the integration constants and the behavior of moments at various points. Clarifications are sought on the approach to calculating moments and the integration steps involved. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of accurately formulating the bending moments to achieve the correct deflection result.
SolMech
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A beam supported at two locations is subjected to two equal loads at the end points
Compute the central deflection W.

Schematic:

\downarrow........\downarrow
____________________________
<--->Δ<-------><------->Δ<--->
...a...L...L...a

The delta's are the supports the arrows the forces F and a & L distances

Homework Equations



M(x) = E*I*W"(X)

The Attempt at a Solution



At first I try to formulate the momentum along the beam. x = 0 at the center of the beam.

I thought it would be zero at the points where the Forces are, and maximum at the center.
So I came up with:

M(x) = F(1+\frac{x}{a+L})*(a+L) with x left from the center and

M(x) = F(1-\frac{x}{a+L})*(a+L) with x right from the center.

w" = EI/M(x)
Integrating this twice should yield the result:
w'(x) = \frac{F}{2EI}x^{2} + \frac{F}{EI}(a+L)x + C

But w'(0) = 0 so C = 0

integrating once more gives:
w(x) = \frac{F}{6EI}x^{3} + \frac{F}{EI}(a+L)x^{2} + C

solving for C with w(L)=0 gives: C = - \frac{FL^{2}}{EI}(\frac{a}{2}+\frac{2L}{3})

which therefore should be the max deflection, because at x=0 deflection is max and w(0) = C

The problem is I have no way to check my result, and I'm not quite sure of the result. Could someone check me and explain me where I went wrong (if so)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SolMech said:
M(x) = F(1+\frac{x}{a+L})*(a+L) with x left from the center and
Could you explain how you arrive at that, please? I'm not saying it's wrong...
 
With the argument that it should be zero at the force and maximum at the midpoint, I determined them to be linear in between, so that with negative x, M(x) goes from x= -a-l -> M(-(a+L))=0 to x=0 giving M(0)=F(a+L).

Also I see that i did not integrate right, forgot some constants, but the problem lies mainly in the determination of the momentum along the beam, the rest is straightforward I guess.
 
SolMech said:
With the argument that it should be zero at the force and maximum at the midpoint, I determined them to be linear in between, so that with negative x, M(x) goes from x= -a-l -> M(-(a+L))=0 to x=0 giving M(0)=F(a+L).
I approached it by actually taking moments. For a point x left of centre, x < L, there's an anticlockwise moment F(x+L) from the support and a clockwise one F(x+L+a) from the load. Doesn't that make the bending moment Fa for all x between the supports? Beyond the supports it's F(L+a-x).
 
I'm not sure how you determined these moments.. What do you mean by: "I approached it by actually taking moments". Did you divide the problem into halfs and used M = F*x,
and then used that if there is a load F, the support gives a reaction force F?

If this is what you did, it is still not obvious for me how you arrived at the moments from this.
 
Ah never mind! Got it, thank you for your help!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top