Kater's Pendulum Vs Bar Pendulum

Thread starter GabrielMoon
Start date Feb 16, 2013
Tags

Pendulum

AI Thread Summary

Kater's pendulum and the bar pendulum are both types of compound pendulums, but they serve different purposes in measuring gravitational acceleration. Kater's pendulum is designed for precision measurements and can be adjusted for accuracy, making it more versatile in experimental settings. In contrast, the bar pendulum is simpler and easier to construct but may not provide the same level of precision. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the experiment, such as the need for accuracy versus ease of use. Understanding these differences can help determine which pendulum is more suitable for a given application.

Feb 16, 2013

GabrielMoon

I am not able to think which pendulum is more better.
Both are compound pendulums and i think kater's is better, but for what reasons, i am not sure.
Thank you in advance!

Physics news on Phys.org

Feb 16, 2013

Drakkith

Mentor

Surely you must have some reason you are aware of. Think about it. What are the differences in the two? What would make one better than the other?

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

View full post »