Troubleshooting Titration: Hair & Water Effects

  • Thread starter Thread starter ASidd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Titration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on concerns about the accuracy of a titration solution due to the presence of a tiny piece of hair and water droplets in the funnel used for transferring the solution. The impact of the hair on the mass of the oxalic acid is considered negligible, as it is unlikely to introduce significant error. The few droplets of water in the funnel are also deemed unlikely to cause substantial changes in volume, especially if the solution was made up to the mark in the volumetric flask. However, for optimal accuracy and peace of mind, it is suggested to prepare a new solution. It is also recommended to rinse the funnel with distilled water to ensure no residue remains, and to compare the results of both the original and new solutions to assess any differences in titration outcomes. Overall, while the errors may not be significant, starting fresh could enhance confidence in the results.
ASidd
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Okay this maybe a silly question but I had to ask.

In school we are making standard solution to perform a titration. To do this we measured in grams a sample of oxalic acid and mixed in water and then made the solution up to mark in a volumetric flask.

When I did my titration; as I was mixing my oxalic acid in water I realized there was a tiny very tiny piece of hair in it. I have no idea how it got there. It was really small BUT our teacher said that we had to be sure to measure the mass of the acid used very accurately.
So my question is how much can a tiny piece of hair affect the mass??

Also When I had made my solution up to mark in the volumetric flask, I transferred it into a bottle using a funnel which was slightly wet. It probably had 3-4 droplets of water in it.

Can a few droplets cause significant changes in volume? Would it be better to start again and make a new solution?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Ideally and if you have the time and possibility, then yes, do it again. Also for the sake of your morale. It will go better the second time.

Then I do not think the errors are very great. There is probably nothing soluble in the hair to give greater than your inevitable % of error; the droplets in the filter might be more but if you filtered 100 or 200 ml I doubt they make measurable difference. Ideally again keep your bad solution and titrate that as well as the good new solution, so then you actually see. But if there are any differences this is still not significant unless you titrate the same solution say 3 times and see what the errors, the variation between the same titrations, are.

Ideally. :wink:
 
Wet funnel shouldn't matter, as long as the droplets didn't contain anything that could react with your titrant (or titrated substance). You should rinse the funnel with a distilled water after transferring the solution, to make sure none of your substance was left there (which means you should collect rinsing water!). You were diluting it to the mark, so the final volume is under control.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...

Similar threads

Back
Top