Determining unit vector of acceleration and velocity in circular motio

AI Thread Summary
In circular motion, the unit vector for velocity is derived by dividing the velocity vector by its magnitude, similar to other types of motion. The position vector in Cartesian coordinates is expressed as a function of time, incorporating sine and cosine functions to represent the circular path. An example provided illustrates the calculation of the unit vector for position, which is dependent on time. The discussion highlights the importance of confirming one's understanding through clear communication. Overall, the complexities of determining unit vectors in circular motion are acknowledged, emphasizing the need for clarity in discussions.
negation
Messages
817
Reaction score
0
As a particle orbits around a circle, the unit vector of the velocity and acceleration component is constantly changing, so, how do I determine the unit vector?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The unit vector for, say, velocity, is the velocity vector divided by the vector-magnitude - same as for any motion.
What is the problem? Can you provide an example where a difficulty arises?

$$\vec v = v\hat v: \hat v = \frac{\vec v}{v}$$

eg. Circular motion about origin at constant speed v and radius R, in Cartesian coordinates:

##\vec r (t) = \hat\imath R\sin\omega t + \hat\jmath R\cos\omega t : v=R\omega##

The unit vector for position would be:

##\hat r = \hat\imath \sin\omega t + \hat\jmath \cos\omega t ##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Simon Bridge said:
The unit vector for, say, velocity, is the velocity vector divided by the vector-magnitude - same as for any motion.
What is the problem? Can you provide an example where a difficulty arises?

$$\vec v = v\hat v: \hat v = \frac{\vec v}{v}$$

eg. Circular motion about origin at constant speed v and radius R, in Cartesian coordinates:

##\vec r (t) = \hat\imath R\sin\omega t + \hat\jmath R\cos\omega t : v=R\omega##

The unit vector for position would be:

##\hat r = \hat\imath \sin\omega t + \hat\jmath \cos\omega t ##

Just as I suspected. I wanted to confirm my understanding.
Thanks for the input.
 
Gah - I think I got suckered: well done!
In future - if you want to confirm your understanding, just state your understanding and ask.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top