What is the process for determining Fourier coefficients?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the equation \(\sum_{i=1}^{n}A_i=i\) and whether it implies \(A_i=i\). Participants clarify that the left side represents a sum of terms \(A_1 + A_2 + \cdots + A_n\), while the right side refers to the index variable \(i\), which is misleading due to the repeated use of the same variable. It is suggested that a clearer notation, such as \(\sum_{k=1}^n A_k = i\), would improve understanding. The conversation also touches on the context of determining Fourier coefficients, with a reference to a related thread for further exploration. Clear notation is emphasized as crucial for mathematical clarity.
member 428835
hey pf!

can someone explain to me what to do if presented with an equation like this: \sum_{i=1}^{n}A_i=i
is this identical to stating A_i=i? either way, can you please explain.

thanks!

josh
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
joshmccraney said:
hey pf!

can someone explain to me what to do if presented with an equation like this: \sum_{i=1}^{n}A_i=i
is this identical to stating A_i=i? either way, can you please explain.

thanks!

josh
It doesn't make much sense to me. On the left side, i is an index variable that takes on the values 1, 2, 3, ..., n, so I have no idea what it means on the right side.

Where did you see this? If it's from a textbook, can you post a picture?
 
Just taking it at face value, it means
##A_1 + A_2 + \cdots + A_n = i##

The ##i## in the sum is a "bound variable" or "dummy variable". You could replace it by anything else (except ##n##) without changing the meaning. The ##i## on the right hand side means ##i##.

But using ##i## twice in one equation like that is horrible, as Mark44 said. It would have been more literate to write something like
$$\sum_{k=1}^n A_k = i$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top