When getting phase angle difference, do amplitudes have to be positive

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the phase angle difference between two sinusoidal functions, f(x) and g(x). It is clarified that the phase angle difference is defined as the difference between the two phase angles, regardless of their amplitudes being positive or negative. The calculations show that while one interpretation suggests a phase difference of 15°, converting the negative amplitude results in a phase difference of 165°. Ultimately, the correct phase angle difference is determined to be 225°, as both functions need to be expressed with the same sign for accurate comparison. Thus, the consensus is that the phase difference should reflect the correct signs of the angles involved.
Vishera
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
$$f(x)=32sin(x+60°)\quad and\quad g(x)=-1.5sin(x+45°)$$

Would the phase angle difference here be 15° or is that incorrect? I think the amplitudes don't have to be the same but I'm not sure if they at least have to be both positive.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
-sin(a) = sin(a+π). See what happens.
 
n = 180 and a<90, for -sin(a) = sin(a+n)
 
$$-1.5sin(x+45°)\\ =1.5sin(x+225°)$$

Here the phase angle difference is 165°. So which would be more correct? The phase angle difference is simply defined as the difference between the two phase angles in two sinusoids, right? So are they both right?
 
When you look at the graphs, the phase difference is the difference between corresponding points (e.g. max) on the the two curves. Therefore they both need to expressed with the same sign. In this case 225° is the correct value for phase difference.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top