Power Loss Confusion: I^2R vs V^2/R

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the apparent contradiction between the two equations for power loss: P = I^2R and P = V^2/R. The first equation indicates that power loss increases with resistance when current is constant, while the second suggests that power loss decreases with increased resistance when voltage is constant. This confusion arises from the different conditions under which each equation is applied. Both equations are consistent but highlight different scenarios in electrical systems. Understanding the context of fixed current versus fixed voltage clarifies the relationship between resistance and power loss.
K Dhiraj Bhak
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Power loss doubt: power loss = I^2 R Power loss = V^2 / R But the 2 equations are contradictory ,,, from the first equation , we can say " MORE THE RESISTANCE MORE THE POWER LOSS" from the second equation ,,, it is the other way round... Why does this happen? ( usually the 1st equation is used for power loss expression ,, but i don't know why ,, and i want to know why the second equation can't be used)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
K Dhiraj Bhak said:
Power loss doubt: power loss = I^2 R Power loss = V^2 / R But the 2 equations are contradictory ,,, from the first equation , we can say " MORE THE RESISTANCE MORE THE POWER LOSS" from the second equation ,,, it is the other way round... Why does this happen? ( usually the 1st equation is used for power loss expression ,, but i don't know why ,, and i want to know why the second equation can't be used)
The expressions are consistent. The first one says that the more resistance the more the power loss if the current is held fixed. Just the opposite if the voltage is held fixed.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top