Quantum Eraser experiment reproduced at home

fizixfan
Messages
105
Reaction score
35
I'm just posting the bare bones of this experiment to begin with, as it was quite the task just to attach all the photos in the proper order. But this is about quantum weirdness, and how it can be demonstrated at home with polarized film, a straight piece of thin wire, and a red laser pointer. It's based on an article in Scientific American from April 14, 2007 called "A Do-It-Yourself Quantum Eraser." I think I've done this properly and I'm fairly satisfied with the results.

I will elaborate on this in the near future. For now, I hope the pictures can speak for themselves.

DSC_1889_Apparatus_single_wire_diffraction_combined_50_1232x816.jpg

Figure 1. Apparatus (red laser pointer, single wire only without path labeler, & diffraction pattern on wall)

DSC_1886_Diffraction pattern with single wire.jpg

Figure 2. Close-up of diffraction pattern on wall from laser beam passing through single wire.

DSC_1834_Apparatus_with_path_labeler_and_collapsed_interference_pattern_50 - Copy.jpg

Figure 3. Apparatus with path labeler and collapsed diffraction pattern on wall.

DSC_1854_Interference_collapsed_by_H-V_path_labeler.jpg

Figure 4. Close-up of collapsed diffraction pattern on wall after passing through path labeler.

DSC_1864_Apparatus_with_analyzer_and_eraser_50.jpg

Figure 5. Apparatus with path labeler and analyzer with restored interference pattern on wall.

DSC_1826_Diffraction_pattern_restored_with_eraser.jpg

Figure 6. Close-up of restored diffraction pattern on wall after passing through path labeler and analyzer.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For me, the pictures do not speak for themselves ... some elaboration at each step is required.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
UltrafastPED said:
For me, the pictures do not speak for themselves ... some elaboration at each step is required.

Yes, you're right. I will soon be editing this post to explain in greater detail what is happening at each step. I hope it's okay to post a "work in progress" in this forum. Bear with me, I'm new here, and I do appreciate your feedback. It keeps me motivated!
 
Here is a photo of the apparatus used in this experiment - a thin wire with orthogonal polarizers on either side ("path labeler"), polarized film ("analyzer") rotated at 45°relative to the path labeler, and a red laser pointer. I would have included this in the first post, but I could only upload six attachments.

DSC_1902_Quantum_eraser_apparatus.jpg
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top