Complex Numbers: The Phase of a Complex Number

AI Thread Summary
The phase of a complex number in the form a = C * exp(i φ) is indeed φ, but it is not uniquely defined due to the periodic nature of the exponential function. When C > 0, the phase can be represented as φ + 2πn for any integer n, necessitating a definition that constrains it to a specific interval. For C < 0, the phase must incorporate the sign of C, resulting in a shift of π in the phase. If C = 0, the phase becomes undefined. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurately working with complex numbers.
pamparana
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
I just wanted to check something. If I have a complex number of the form

a = C * \exp(i \phi)

where C is some non-complex scalar constant. Then the phase of this complex number is simply \phi. Is that correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
pamparana said:
I just wanted to check something. If I have a complex number of the form

a = C * \exp(i \phi)

where C is some non-complex scalar constant. Then the phase of this complex number is simply \phi. Is that correct?
If ##C > 0## then this is almost correct. However, the phase is not well-defined under this definition, because ##C\exp(i\phi) = C\exp(i(\phi+2\pi n))## for any integer ##n##. You can get around this by defining the phase to be the coset ##\phi + 2\pi \mathbb{Z}## or by constraining it to be in the interval ##[0,2\pi)## or ##[-\pi, \pi)## or some other half-open interval of length ##2\pi##.

If ##C < 0##, then you need to absorb the sign of ##C## into the phase:
$$a = -|C|\exp(i \phi) = |C|\exp(i(\phi + \pi))$$

If ##C = 0## then the phase is undefined.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you for this detailed answer!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

3
Replies
108
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top