Why Are Statistical Significance Maps Used in Cosmic Ray Anisotropy Studies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vaart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Significance
AI Thread Summary
Statistical significance maps are essential in cosmic ray anisotropy studies as they help distinguish real signals from background fluctuations. These maps provide a quantitative measure of how likely it is that observed variations in cosmic ray intensity are genuine rather than random noise. The significance level is influenced by factors such as radiation intensity and observation time, with higher significance indicating a greater likelihood of a true signal. Confusion may arise regarding negative significance levels, which can occur in certain statistical contexts. Understanding these maps enhances the analysis of cosmic ray behavior and their anisotropic properties.
vaart
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Dear All,

I have a question regarding the understanding of anisotropy of cosmic rays and how to understand them better. To determine the anisotropy I have seen a lot of papers where they use maps that have a Relative Intensity map and a Statistical significance map of the sky.

I understand the relative intensity map, but I don't understand why the statistical significance maps are used, could some one explain this to me?

Thanks,

caart
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hmmm... do you happen to have a link to one of the maps?
 
Sure, here is a paper that I have been recently reading.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.2326
It's figure 3 at page 15.
At section 3.2, they are explained but I don't really understand it yet, they say that they use the Li and Ma paper:
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1983ApJ...272..317L&defaultprint=YES&filetype=.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm actually not certain. At first glance I would think that the significance level depends on the intensity of the radiation and the observation time, with a higher significance corresponding to a higher chance that the signal is real and not a background fluctuation, but I'm not sure why the significance level goes into the negative.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top