Yes, you really are weak on integrals. It might pay you to go back and review "Riemann sums".
One way of defining "integral" is that ∫ab f(x) dx IS the area between x= a and x=b bounded on top by the graph of y= f(x) and below by the line y= 0.
One way of approximating that is to divide the x-axis into many pieces, each of length Δ x. Construct a rectangle on each piece with height f(x*) where x* is some x value inside the piece and that will be close to the area of the curve above the piece. The sum of the areas of all such rectangles will be close to the area under the entire curve. One can show that taking the limit as the number of pieces goes to infinity give the exact area. That is written as ∫f(x) dx where the ∫ represents the Σ of the sum and dx represents the Δ x.
In your case, a 90 degree triangle with legs of length 5 and 12 DOESN'T HAVE any graph or equation connected with it so you CAN'T find the area by an integral!
Well, you can, IF you place a coordinate system on it so that you can think of it as a graph. Staring at a right triangle for a very long time (I'm kinda slow!), it starts to dawn on me that the two legs look a little like x and y axes so I consider setting up a coordinate system with the right angle at (0,0), the x-axis along one leg, and the y-axis along the other. Now I notice that the hypotenuse is (part of) a line passing through the points (0,12) and (5,0) (if you set up your coordinate system so that it passes through (12,0) and (0,5), Okay, that'll work too.).
The line passing through both (0,12) and (5,0) has slope (12-0)/(0-5)= -12/5 and so its equation is y= -(12/5)(x-0)+ 12 or y= -(12/5)x+12. (Integral set up his coordinate system so that leg with length 12 was the x-axis and the leg with length 5 was the y-axis. He got y= -(5/12)(x-12) as the equation of the line {though he mistakenly wrote it as y= -(5/12)x!). Okay, that'll work too.)
The area is, according to the theory, ∫05 (-(12/5)x+ 12)dx. The "antiderivative of this is -(6/5)x2+ 12x+ C. Evaluating at x=5 and x= 0 we get -(6/5)(25)+ 12(5)+ C= -30+ 60+ C= 30+ C and -(6/5)(0)+ 12(0)+ C= C. Subtracting:
30+ C- C= 30. Exactly the same as (1/2)(5)(12)!