- 24,753
- 794
Recent contributions from Baez, Smolin, Rovelli
a couple of these are discussed in https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=114140
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/where_we_stand/
"Fundamental Physics: Where We Stand Today"
John Baez
===============
http://www.nyas.org/publications/UpdateUnbound.asp?UpdateID=41
"A Crisis in Fundamental Physics"
Lee Smolin
published in the New York Academy of Sciences magazine.
The Houghton-Mifflin publishing house plans to release a new book by Lee Smolin this year---what the book is about is suggested by:
http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/CPNSS/events/Conferences/AnnualPublicLecture.htm
Abstract for something called "The Annual Lecture" to be given by Smolin at The London School of Economics CPNSS, in June 2006."...I will begin by proposing an answer to the question of what science is and why it works. Part of the answer is that scientists form a community that is defined by adherence to a set of ethics which encourages honest reporting of observations and results as well as an awareness that future generations will know far more than us. As such science is based on a tragic understanding of how easily we fool ourselves and others and its success is due to the discovery of techniques whose use helps us discover error. In this and other ways I will discuss science is tied to democracy in that both require members of a community to adhere to ethics designed to allow us to achieve as a community far more than would be possible each on our own..."
[my comment: a healthy scientific community requires ethical behavior and some "checks and balances" because even prestigeous elites can succumb to self-delusion and error. it is not simply an egalitarian democracy, nor is it simply an amoral turf-based aristocratic hierarchy---a key ingredient is the empirical ethic]
=============
Recent contributions from Rovelli are mentioned here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=114024
A 59 slide lecture given at Lyon, Introduction to Loop Quantum Gravity
http://www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/~rovelli/Lyon2006II.pdf
Course outline for a History of Science course that Rovelli is currently teaching is here
http://www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/~rovelli/
=============================
We recently had a thread at PF about George Ellis finding misinformation in Susskind's book
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=114068
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603266
On horizons and the cosmic landscape
George F R Ellis
"Susskind claims in his recent book The Cosmic Landscape that evidence for the existence and nature of 'pocket universes' in a multiverse would be available via detailed study of the Cosmic Blackbody Background Radiation. I point out that apart from any other queries one might have about the chain of argument involved, this claim is invalid because it rests on a confusion between the nature of a particle horizon and an event horizon in cosmology."
Ellis is co-author, with Stephen Hawking, of a well-known reference "The Large-Scale Structure of Spacetime". He gives this link to an erroneous passage of Susskind's book.
http://www.twbookmark.com/books/28/0316155799/chapter_excerpt22014.html
a couple of these are discussed in https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=114140
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/where_we_stand/
"Fundamental Physics: Where We Stand Today"
John Baez
===============
http://www.nyas.org/publications/UpdateUnbound.asp?UpdateID=41
"A Crisis in Fundamental Physics"
Lee Smolin
published in the New York Academy of Sciences magazine.
The Houghton-Mifflin publishing house plans to release a new book by Lee Smolin this year---what the book is about is suggested by:
http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/CPNSS/events/Conferences/AnnualPublicLecture.htm
Abstract for something called "The Annual Lecture" to be given by Smolin at The London School of Economics CPNSS, in June 2006."...I will begin by proposing an answer to the question of what science is and why it works. Part of the answer is that scientists form a community that is defined by adherence to a set of ethics which encourages honest reporting of observations and results as well as an awareness that future generations will know far more than us. As such science is based on a tragic understanding of how easily we fool ourselves and others and its success is due to the discovery of techniques whose use helps us discover error. In this and other ways I will discuss science is tied to democracy in that both require members of a community to adhere to ethics designed to allow us to achieve as a community far more than would be possible each on our own..."
[my comment: a healthy scientific community requires ethical behavior and some "checks and balances" because even prestigeous elites can succumb to self-delusion and error. it is not simply an egalitarian democracy, nor is it simply an amoral turf-based aristocratic hierarchy---a key ingredient is the empirical ethic]
=============
Recent contributions from Rovelli are mentioned here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=114024
A 59 slide lecture given at Lyon, Introduction to Loop Quantum Gravity
http://www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/~rovelli/Lyon2006II.pdf
Course outline for a History of Science course that Rovelli is currently teaching is here
http://www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/~rovelli/
=============================
We recently had a thread at PF about George Ellis finding misinformation in Susskind's book
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=114068
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603266
On horizons and the cosmic landscape
George F R Ellis
"Susskind claims in his recent book The Cosmic Landscape that evidence for the existence and nature of 'pocket universes' in a multiverse would be available via detailed study of the Cosmic Blackbody Background Radiation. I point out that apart from any other queries one might have about the chain of argument involved, this claim is invalid because it rests on a confusion between the nature of a particle horizon and an event horizon in cosmology."
Ellis is co-author, with Stephen Hawking, of a well-known reference "The Large-Scale Structure of Spacetime". He gives this link to an erroneous passage of Susskind's book.
http://www.twbookmark.com/books/28/0316155799/chapter_excerpt22014.html
Last edited by a moderator: