How Do You Calculate the Mass of a Wire Using Line Integrals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom McCurdy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Vector
Tom McCurdy
Messages
1,017
Reaction score
1
A wire lies along the piecewise linear curve extending from the point (2,4) to the point (8,6) to the point (8,11). If the density of the wire is given by p(x,y)=2xy+6x, use a line integral to find the mass of the wire.

Here is what I have tried:

C1: (1-t)<2,4>+t<8,6>
C1: x=2+6t y=4+2t

\int_{0}^{1} 2xy+6y dt
\int_{0}^{1} 2(2+6t)(4+2t)+6(2+6t) dt = 82

C2: (1-t)<8,6> + t<8,11>
C2: x=8 y=6+5t

\int_{0}^{1} 2xy+6y dt
\int_{0}^{1} 2(8)(6+5t)+6(8) dt = 184

82+184 = 266

However this is incorrect :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tom McCurdy said:
C1: (1-t)<2,4>+t<8,6>
C1: x=2+6t y=4+2t

\int_{0}^{1} 2xy+6y dt
I think the integrand should be \rho ds=\rho \frac{ds}{dt}dt
where ds is a piece of length from your curve. So if you parametrized the line by \vec r(t), then ds=|\frac{d\vec r}{dt}|dt
 
Are you saying I need to do

\int_{0}^{1} (2xy+6x)* \sqrt{(2y+6)^2+(2x)^2}

C1: (1-t)<2,4>+t<8,6>
C1: x=(2+6t) y=(4+2t)


\int_{0}^{1} (2(2+6t)(4+2t)+6(2+6t)) * \sqrt{(2(4+2t)+6)^2+(2(2+6t))^2}

C2: (1-t)<8,6> + t<8,11>
C2: x=(8) y=(6+5t)

\int_{0}^{1} 2xy+6y dt
\int_{0}^{1} (2(8)(6+5t)+6(8)) * \sqrt{(2(6+5t)+6)^2+(2(8))^2} =

Then add the results of the two integrals?

However this is incorrect :(
 
Galileo said:
I think the integrand should be \rho ds=\rho \frac{ds}{dt}dt
where ds is a piece of length from your curve. So if you parametrized the line by \vec r(t), then ds=|\frac{d\vec r}{dt}|dt

Any ideas... I was not quite sure what you meanat by this post...
 
Ahhh I figured it out... I was doing the wrong dervatives...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top