Accelerated charges radiate energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kenny Lee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Energy
AI Thread Summary
Accelerated charges indeed radiate energy, a concept rooted in Maxwell's equations. To prove this, one can start by examining the Larmor formula, which describes the power radiated by a non-relativistic accelerating charge. Understanding the derivation of electromagnetic waves can also provide insights, as it relates to how changing electric and magnetic fields propagate energy. Resources such as lecture slides from reputable physics departments can offer valuable equations and frameworks for further exploration. Engaging with these materials will enhance comprehension of the relationship between acceleration and radiation in electromagnetic theory.
Kenny Lee
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hi! Accelerated charges radiate energy. I've always just taken that to word, but my exams are coming, and I would really like to broaden my understanding a little. How can we go about proving that using Maxwell's theories? I'm not asking for a complete derivation because I know that might be too involved. I just need some hints, how I may approach the problem, or if possible a link to some website with relevant information. I know the derivation for plane EM wave, so if there's anyway that relates to the present question, pls let me know. Thansk very much.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here area few lecture slides i fond freely available on the web. I had a quick look through and all relevant equations seem to be there and they're not all derived if you want to have a go yourself.

http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~kuncic/lectures/HEA_L5.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

Charge density in sphere that makes constant radial E-field inside
Replies
14
Views
2K
Moving charge deflected by a loop of wire
Replies
1
Views
719
A charge q approaching two stationary charges q1 and q2
Replies
7
Views
952
Please explain this suggested solution for the field inside a charged hollow sphere
Replies
17
Views
1K
How to Apply Derivatives in Physics Problems?
Replies
9
Views
1K
Should I Consider the Electric Field Outside a Uniformly Charged Sphere?
Replies
2
Views
3K
Minimizing the Energy of Two Conductors Very Far Apart
Replies
23
Views
2K
Capacitor Questions Charging and Discharging
Replies
4
Views
3K
I Thought I Understood Gauss' Law (Sheets)
Replies
26
Views
2K
Why Is Work Positive When Done Against the Electric Field?
Replies
22
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top