Total number of photons in universe

  • Thread starter Thread starter genius2687
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons Universe
genius2687
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm looking at a question to a practice exam. It states the following.

Imagine the universe is a spherical cavity at a temperature of 3K. Using this assumption, estimate the total number of photons in the universe.

Notes: integral[0->infinity,{x^2dx/(e^x-1)*dx}=2.4

black body energy density:

u = h_/(pi^2*c^3)*w^3/(e^((h_w/(kT))-1)


I need to find out the number of photons per unit volume (N/V). Once I have that, I can find what I'm looking for.

Any ideas on how to solve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
genius2687 said:
I'm looking at a question to a practice exam. It states the following.

Imagine the universe is a spherical cavity at a temperature of 3K. Using this assumption, estimate the total number of photons in the universe.

Notes: integral[0->infinity,{x^2dx/(e^x-1)*dx}=2.4

black body energy density:

u = h_/(pi^2*c^3)*w^3/(e^((h_w/(kT))-1)


I need to find out the number of photons per unit volume (N/V). Once I have that, I can find what I'm looking for.

Any ideas on how to solve this?
Interesting problem.

Wien's radiation law will give you the energy density (energy / unit volume) for a given temperature in the interval \omega \rightarrow \omega + \delta\omega. You should be able to determine from that the photon density. Then you have to estimate the size of the universe. Good luck!

AM
 
Any thermodynamics textbook will have the calculation for radiation from a black body. The calculation for # of photons will start in the same place; you should be able to see where the two separate.

edit: You already know the energy density. Think of that as (Energy per particle) x (# of particles). What's the energy of a photon with frequency w?
 
Last edited:
I know this isn't what you want to hear, but I think that it is worth saying. In addition to the 'regular' photons, there are many more virtual photons. Virtual photons are real, just, by definition, don't have enough energy to be observable. These make up electromagnetic fields. Every electron, and negative charge spews out basically unlimited numbers of these photons.

Also, both quantum mechanics and now realitivity predict that space is full of nearly unlimited (the former) to at least some (later) energy, everywhere.

So if you don't know how to give them the answer that they want, just say its incalcuable for the reasons I have stated above.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top