How to Calculate Charge Density on an Irregular Conductor?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the local surface charge density on an irregular conductor, the relationship between electric field and charge density is crucial. The electric field varies from 56.0 kN/c to 28.0 kN/c, indicating that the charge density is inversely proportional to the radius of curvature. At the largest radius of curvature, the charge density is at its minimum, while at the smallest radius, it is at its maximum, potentially double the minimum value. The correct formula to use is v = aE = (aσ/ε₀), linking electric potential, electric field, radius of curvature, and charge density. Understanding this relationship allows for accurate calculations of charge density based on the given electric field values.
benndamann33
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Question: The electric field on the surface of an irregularly shaped conductor varies from 56.0 kN/c to 28.0kN/c. calculate the local surface charge density at the point on the surface where the radius of curvature of the surface is (a) greatest and (b) smallest.

I am stuck as far as how to get an exact number. The only thing I concluded was that at the largest radius of curvature, charge density is smallest, and I called this lamda. Because electric field ranges to double the smallest value, I concluded at the smallest radius of curvature the charge density is 2 lamda. Is this totally incorrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The charge density is proportional to 1/(radius of curvature at that particular point).
 
I understand that, but I'm just given the information above, which is simply an electric field, so I couldn't find the exact charge density any more than what I have above, could I?
 
Ok correct my mistake I totally read that wrong. The equation relating the potential and the electric field just outside the surface is:

v=aE=\frac{a\sigma}{\epsilon_0}

where a is the radius of curvature at a particular point and sigma is the charge density.
 
thanks man, I was overlooking that for some reason, appreciate it.
 
sorry about the original post just didn't have my head screwed on.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top