3D shapes with perfect polygons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the formation of 3D shapes using regular polygons, specifically exploring the minimum number of polygons needed and the angles required for their assembly. The user initially calculates angles for pentagons but struggles with accuracy, estimating a corner angle of 12 degrees and concluding that a pentagon would need around 80 faces to form a 3D shape. It is noted that only five convex polyhedra can be formed from congruent regular polygons, and the user seeks clarification on the specific angle needed for three pentagons to fit together. The conversation also touches on the potential for creating more shapes by combining different types of polygons, referencing Archimedean solids. Understanding these geometric principles is crucial for accurately constructing 3D shapes from regular polygons.
scott_alexsk
Messages
335
Reaction score
0
Hello, (edit should be regular polygons in title)

I have been thinking a lot recently about 3D shapes formed by 2D regular polygons. I was asking myself if there would be any way to calculate the minimium number of regular polygons to form a complete 3D shape. It is fairly easy with an equilateral triangle, which requires 4 sides, and for a square, with 6, but when I got to pentagons many problems arised.

For one I was trying to calculate the angle the corners of 3 pentagons would have to be placed up agaisnt each other relative to a plane (see drawing). I ended up just assuming that the angle was 12, though I really have no idea, and continued with my estimates. So assuming that x (in the diagram) is 12 degrees, then I can calculate that the angle of each face to the other is about 156 degrees. With 156 I found the number of sides of a ploygon with those angles to be 15. From there I guesstimated that a pentagon forming a 3D shape by itself must have a minimum of around 80 faces.

Now I have several questions. Is my assumption that the angle x is 12, correct, if not how do I preform a correct calculation? Also what is the true number of sides a regular pentagon must have to form a 3D shape? Is there an equation which can identify the number of faces required for certain polygons to form 3d shapes? Finally, is there any way a single regular ploygon can approminate a sphere? Beyond a hexagon it is impossible to form 3D shapes since the measure of internal angles goes beyond 120, which means 3 corners cannot intersect.

Thanks,
-scott

Hopefully you can read this.
 

Attachments

  • scan0004.jpg
    scan0004.jpg
    4.3 KB · Views: 626
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yeah, I knew there would be only a few. But I still have one question. What is the angle that 3 corners of a pentagon have to be bent relative to a plane, (see drawing) to fit together?

Thanks,
-scott
 
I can't see the drawing because it hasn't been approved yet :-p. If you're talking about the angle I assume you're talking about then there is an expression for it on that page (search for "dihedral angle").
 
Thanks for the links and info Data.

-scott
 
Data said:
The number of (convex) polyhedra you can get out of congruent regular polygons is quite limited (there are only 5).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platonic_solid.


If you allow more than one type of regular polygon, you can get a few more. Look up: Archimedean solids.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top