How Can You Calculate t1 and t2 for a Rocket-Powered Sled on Ice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cy19861126
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Hard
AI Thread Summary
To calculate t1 and t2 for the rocket-powered sled, the motion is divided into two phases: acceleration and constant velocity. The first phase uses the equation d1 = 0.5 * a * t1^2, while the second phase uses d2 = v * t2, where v is the final velocity after acceleration. The total distance traveled is given by d1 + d2 = 17500 ft, and the total time is t1 + t2 = 90 s. By substituting t2 with (90 - t1) in the distance equation, it allows for solving t1 and subsequently t2. The solution requires careful manipulation of these equations to find the values of t1 and t2 accurately.
cy19861126
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
An ice shed powered by a rocket engine starts from rest on a large frozen lake and accelerates at 40 ft/s2. After some time t1, the rocket engine is shut down adn the sled moves with constant velocity v for a time t2. If the total distance traveled by the sled is 17500 ft and the total time is 90 s, find t1 and t2

My work so far... I divided the work into two parts: shed that accelerated and the shed that moves in constant motion. Since I know the equation is d = vi + 0.5at2. I plugged in 0 for vi, since the rocket starts from rest. I plugged in a for 40 ft/s2. Since I don't know what t and d are, I just left them there. I got d1 = 20ti2 Next, since I know d1 + d2 = 17500 ft and t1 + t2 is 90s, I plugged 20ti2 into d1 and got 20ti2 + t2 = 90s. What should I do next? I tried 3 hours on this hk problem, using different equations. But since I don't know the final velocity, I can't use any other equations for acceleration. I tried to use the value of the total distance, 17500 and total time 90s on equation d = 0.5 (vi + vf)t, but the velocity isn't constant so I can't do anything about it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest you write down the equations of displacement (i.e. the distance travelled) for every part of the motion first. In the first period, t1, you have constant acceleration, in the second one, t2, you have constant velocity.
 
radou said:
I suggest you write down the equations of displacement (i.e. the distance travelled) for every part of the motion first. In the first period, t1, you have constant acceleration, in the second one, t2, you have constant velocity.
Hi, thanks for the suggestion. I used the equation d = vt and d = at2. For the first part, I plugged in d = at2 and got d1 = 40 * t2. For the second part, I plugged in d = vt, and I got d2 = v(90 - t1) since I don't know the velocity yet, I just put v there. Then I used d1 + d2 = 17500, and plugged in the numbers, and I got (40ft/s2)t1^2 + 90v - t1v = 17500. How can I solve for t1 in this equation? I have two variables in one equation
 
Last edited:
cy19861126 said:
Hi, thanks for the suggestion. I used the equation d = vt and d = at2. For the first part, I plugged in d = at2 and got d1 = 40 * t2. For the second part, I plugged in d = vt, and I got d2 = v(90 - t1) since I don't know the velocity yet, I just put v there. Then I used d1 + d2 = 17500, and plugged in the numbers, and I got (40ft/s2)t1^2 + 90v - t1v = 17500. How can I solve for t1 in this equation? I have two variables in one equation

The equation of displacement for the first part is d_{1}=\frac{1}{2}at_{1}^2, and for the second part d_{2}=vt_{2}. Now, the velocity v equals a*t1, so, after plugging that in, you get d_{2}=at_{1}t_{2}. Further on, as you said, you use the condition that d1 + d2 = 17500, which implies \frac{1}{2}at_{1}^2+at_{1}t_{2}=17500 (*). Now, since you know that t1+t2 =90, just express t2 from this equation, i.e. t2 = 90-t1, and plug it into the equation marked with (*). Now you can calculate t1 from that equation, and t2 from t2 = 90-t1. I suggest that you convert ft to meters, depending on how your final solution must look like, regarding the units.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top