Calculating Specific Heat of Unknown Sample Using Calorimetry

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the specific heat of an unknown metallic sample using calorimetry principles. The setup involves an aluminum calorimeter containing water and two metallic blocks, one of which is copper. The participants emphasize the importance of setting up the energy transfer equations correctly, noting that the total heat transferred from the blocks to the calorimeter must account for both the known copper block and the unknown sample. A suggested approach involves calculating the heat transferred from the copper block first, then isolating the unknown heat transfer to determine the specific heat of the unknown sample. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in the equations and step-by-step calculations for accurate results.
trah22
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



an aluminum calorimeter with a mass of 100g contains 250g of water. THe calorimeter and water are in thermal equilibrium at 10 degrees celcius. Two metallic blocks are placed into the water. One is copper of 50g at 80celcius. The other is block is 70g and originally at temp of 100Celcius. The entire system stablilizes at a final temp of 20celcius. Determine the specific heat of the unknown sample.

Homework Equations


Q=mC(changeofT)
so c=Q/m(changeofT)
Qcold=-Qhot

The Attempt at a Solution



MwCw(10celcius)+MaCa(10celcius)=-McuCcu(20-80)-MukCuk(20-100)
so
250g(4186J/Kg)(10)+100(900J/Kg)(10)=-50(387J/kg)(-60)-MukCuk(-80)

im not sure if i set up the unknows correctly (Mu=mass of unknown and Cuk=specific heat of unknow)... can anyone help me out
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are doing it correctly, and you're doing it all in one equation, whereas I was thinking of breaking it down into steps as follows. It's been a while since I've done this type of problem, but it seems to be that this is what needs to be done:

1. Calculate the total amount of energy transferred from the blocks to the calorimeter (this is the left hand side of the equation you have written down).

Q_{\textrm{tot}} = m_{\textrm{H2O}}c_{\textrm{H2O}} \Delta T_{\textrm{cal}} + m_{\textrm{Al}}c_{\textrm{Al}} \Delta T_{\textrm{cal}}

where \Delta T_{\textrm{cal}} [/tex] is the change in temperature of the calorimeter equal to 20 C - 10 C = +10 C<br /> <br /> Now you know how much energy was transferred from the two blocks to the calorimeter. Unfortunately, some of this came from the copper block, and some from the unknown block. You know the specific heat of copper, so you can figure out how much heat was transferred from the copper:<br /> <br /> Q_{\textrm{Cu}} = m_{\textrm{Cu}}c_{\textrm{Cu}} \Delta T_{\textrm{Cu}}<br /> <br /> Then you can subtract this from the total heat in order to determine how much came from the unknown block (this is equivalent to isolating the unknown term on the right hand side of your equation):<br /> <br /> Q_{\textrm{unk}} = Q_{\textrm{tot}} - Q_{\textrm{Cu}}<br /> <br /> And, of course, since you know the mass of the unknown block and its change in temperature, you can easily calculate c_unk from Q_unk.
 
Last edited:
i think i got thanks for the explanation:smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top