Solve 3 Chemical Equilibrium Questions & Calculate Kc

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving three chemical equilibrium questions and calculating equilibrium constants (Kc). The first question highlights that two systems cannot be in equilibrium at a given temperature due to a single Kc value, emphasizing the importance of concentration units in Kc calculations. The second question compares two temperatures, T1 and T2, to determine where the amount of product B will be higher, with a focus on the relationship between temperature and equilibrium concentrations. The third question involves calculating Kc for a reaction involving CO2 and H2, given specific conditions in a rigid container. The thread seeks assistance in understanding these concepts and calculations.
Maximillien
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have 3 questions i can't seem to solve anyways thanks in advance.

1) If the equilbrium constant at a cetain temperature is 24 for the reaction, 2NO(g) <-> N2(g) + 02(g). Both of the systems listed below cannon be in equilbrium because at this temperature because there is only one value of Kc.

[NO] = System 1 - System 2
1.06 1.56
[N2]
[O2]

Since the equilbrium constant does not have units it doesn't matter which unit we use for concentration when calculating Kc.

2a) At T1, K=0.013
At T2, K = 083

If 1.00 mole of A is placed in a 1.00L reaction vessel, at which temperature will the amount of B at equilbfrium be higher? Explain your answer.

2b) If delta H < 0, which temperature is higher? T1 or T2? Explain your answer.

3) Use the information below to calculate Kc for the follwing reactiosn at 600 decrees celcius

C02(g) + H2(g) <-> CO(g) + H2O(g)

A gas mixture that consits of equal amounts of Co and H20 was injected into a 1.97 rigid walled container at 600 degreees ceclius until the pressure reached 7.25 atm. When the reaction reaced equilbirum, 0.024 mole Of CO were present.

Thx much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So...what have you tried so far?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top