Hooke's law - addition of force constant

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the equation for the total spring constant of two springs connected in series, expressed as 1/ktot = 1/k1 + 1/k2. Participants clarify that the relationship arises because each spring stretches less when connected, requiring less force to achieve the same displacement. The manipulation of the equations F = k1x1 = k2x2 = k(x1 + x2) is emphasized, with guidance on solving for x2 and substituting back to find k in terms of k1 and k2. The impact of spring length on the spring constant is also highlighted, noting that a longer spring stretches less under the same force. Overall, the conversation aims to clarify the relationship between force constants in connected springs.
ys2050
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I need to figure out an equation that shows the relationship between the force constants of two springs that are connected together.
I know that the 1/ktot = 1/k1 + 1/k2
but I have to shows all the steps to obtain this equation...
I know that
F = k1x1 = k2x2 = k(x1 + x2)
I tried manipulating the equation to get the expression I want but i don't seem to be getting it... :(
Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's not 'the' equation. That's two equations. Solve k1*x1=k2*x2 for x2. Put that into k1*x1=k*(x1+x2). Cancel the common factor of x1 and solve for k in terms of k1 and k2.
 
Good point. You are probably asking why, for example, if I hook two springs with spring constant k together, the resulting spring constant is k/2? Because to get to a given displacement, each spring has to stretch only half as far. The material properties didn't change. Imagine two springs made of the same stuff, one 1m long and the other 2m long. It really is easier to stretch the long spring by an extra meter than the short spring.
 
Hey, this is just like a couple of other questions asked about the spring constant of a wire last night. If the bulk modulus of the material is M, then the spring constant of a wire is k=M*A/L, where A is the cross sectional area and L is the length. Double L and you halve k.
 
Dick said:
Good point. You are probably asking why, for example, if I hook two springs with spring constant k together, the resulting spring constant is k/2? Because to get to a given displacement, each spring has to stretch only half as far. The material properties didn't change. Imagine two springs made of the same stuff, one 1m long and the other 2m long. It really is easier to stretch the long spring by an extra meter than the short spring.

hmmm I'm not sure if I'm getting it...
so in my case, the total spring did not have to exert as much force in order for the spring to get to a certain distant because...?? :confused:
 
Because the 2m spring has to flex the material less when stretched by one meter than the 1m spring, if you want to put it that way. Your derivation is correct. If you have access to stuff, hook two springs together and measure. You'll see you were right.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top