Rotational group SO(3) in classical mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the Lie algebra associated with the SO(3) group of rotations in classical mechanics. The matrix A represents an infinitesimal rotation generator, which is linked to the axis of rotation and the angle through its decomposition into linear combinations. The parametrization R(t) involves both a fixed rotation axis and a change in angle, as it describes the evolution of the rotation over time. The relationship between angular velocity vectors and antisymmetric matrices highlights the isomorphism between these vectors and the Lie algebra of SO(3). Further resources on Lie groups and their applications in mechanics are sought to deepen understanding.
m_dronti
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi!
This is my first post here. I'm currently studying analytical/classical mechanics and have some problems understanding how the Lie algebra is formed in relation to the SO(3) group of rotations. My problem is this:

Given a matrix representation R of some rotation around a fixed axis, we can write this as

R=exp[A]

where A is some matrix. We can also parametrize this as

R(t)=exp[tA]

where R(0)=1, where 1 is the identity matrix. I understand how SO(3) is formed, how it is isomorphic to P^3 and that it should be a Lie group (but I have a very vague understanding of Lie groups). But I don't understand at all

1) what is A exactly? How is it related to the angle and rotation axis?
2) given that A can be decomposed as a linear combination of the infinitesimal rotation generators (and how should one understand them), what does that actually tell us in terms of what the Lie Algebra is?
3) when doing the parametrization, does this involve a fixed rotation axis or only a change in angle?

I have some more questions on this, but it might be best to start of there and see where it leads. If anyone can recommend homepages with more info (basic) on Lie groups in relation to this I would appreciate it.

Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi m_dronti,

For a particle with position vector \mathbf{x} rotating around origin with angular velocity vector \mathbf{\omega}, you have

\dot{\mathbf{x}} = \mathbf{\omega}\times\mathbf{x}

This can also be written as a matrix equation

\dot{\mathbf{x}} = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}0&amp;-\omega_z&amp;\omega_y\\<br /> \omega_z&amp;0&amp;-\omega_x\\-\omega_y&amp;\omega_x&amp;0\end{array}\right)\mathbf{x}

which has the solution

\mathbf{x} = e^{At}\mathbf{x}\left( 0 \right)

where A is the matrix above. So you have an isomorphism between angular velocity vectors and real 3x3 antisymmetric matrices, which are the Lie algebra of SO(3).
 
Last edited:
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top