Can light have a phase velocity faster than c?

redtree
Messages
335
Reaction score
15
Can an electromagnetic wave have a phase velocity greater than c? Is the phase velocity of a photon always c?

As far as I understand, the phase velocity of all massive particles (particles with rest mass) is greater than c.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well neither the group velocity nor the phase velocity is always c.

the group velocity can be greater than c.
not sure whether the phase velocity can be greater than c.
 
As I understand it, the group velocity of a light wave is thought to be the velocity at which information is transmitted. The phase velocity of light in a medium is generally less than the speed of light in a vacuum but in some rare circumstances the phase velocity can be greater than c but it is generally thought that the rate information can be transmitted never exceeds c over any reasonable distances. Confusingly the group velocity can also exceed c in certain rare circumstances but it still claimed information transmission does not exceed c in those conditions.

The velocity of a particle in a medium can exceed the phase velocity of c in the same medium and in those circumstances Cerenkov radiation is given off. I am not sure of the universal truth of your last statement about the phase velocity of massive particles.

This Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_velocity does support your statement.
 
Last edited:
redtree said:
the phase velocity of all massive particles (particles with rest mass) is greater than c.
And if you understood why (say derived from the assumption that a particle of definite momentum is identified with a packet of waves that have no preferred frame), you know that the phase (and group) velocity of any zero-rest-mass particle in vacuum is c.

But in medium? Phase velocity is given simply by refractive index, and commonly exceeds c (n<1). For sufficiently pathological media, even group velocities can take any value. Next question?
 
cesiumfrog said:
And if you understood why (say derived from the assumption that a particle of definite momentum is identified with a packet of waves that have no preferred frame), you know that the phase (and group) velocity of any zero-rest-mass particle in vacuum is c.

But in medium? Phase velocity is given simply by refractive index, and commonly exceeds c (n<1). For sufficiently pathological media, even group velocities can take any value. Next question?


OK, next question(s).

Given that in a medium the phase velocity of light and the group velocity of light can both exceed c and the signal velocity of light (transfer of energy or information) never exceeds c, then

What is the relationship between signal velocity and phase velocity of monochromatic light of wavelength (w) in a medium of phase refractive index (n)?

Is the group velocity of monochromatic light always the same as the phase velocity in a given medium?

Given the equation for group velocity v_g = c\left(n-w\frac{dn}{dw}\right)^{-1}

and if the refractive index of an optical medium is determined empirically for a given wavelength of light can the refractive index for any wavelength of light in the same medium be determined mathematically without further emperical measurements?
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top