Calculating Time Evolution of Density Matrix

dg88
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to calculate the time evolution of a density matrix. Like if there is a mixed state with 50% of |x, 0> and 50% of |y, 0>. After time t due to time evolution, the kets become:

|x,t>= e^(-i/h Ht) |x,0> and so on.

Is it ok to use these kets instead of the original ket to calculate the density matrix after time t? Or is there another method to do it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dg88 said:
Hi,

I am trying to calculate the time evolution of a density matrix. Like if there is a mixed state with 50% of |x, 0> and 50% of |y, 0>. After time t due to time evolution, the kets become:

|x,t>= e^(-i/h Ht) |x,0> and so on.

Is it ok to use these kets instead of the original ket to calculate the density matrix after time t? Or is there another method to do it?

Yes, but don't forget to take the Hermitian conjugate:

<x,t| = <x,0| e^(i/h Ht)

So, you see that if you do this the density matrix evolves in time according to the unitary time evolution:

rho(t) = U rho(0) U-dagger

U = e^(-i/hbar H t)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top