Ampere's Law using the Biot Savart Law

AI Thread Summary
Ampere's Law can be derived from the Biot-Savart Law using elementary calculus, particularly for specific configurations like a current-carrying wire. The magnetic field at a distance r from the wire is found using the Biot-Savart Law, resulting in the expression B = Iμ₀/(2πr). By integrating this expression around a closed path, the relationship between magnetic field and current is established, leading to Ampere's circuital law. While vector calculus provides a more general derivation, the continuity equation also relates to Ampere's Law. The discussion emphasizes that while elementary calculus can derive specific cases, a comprehensive understanding requires more advanced mathematical tools.
anantchowdhary
Messages
372
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to derive Ampere's Law(circuital) using the Biot Savart Law and elementary calculus?


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ampere's Law is equivalent to the conservation of charge i.e. the continuity equation.
 
Can you provide the derivation please..

thanks
 
Please help me! :D
 
You can derive it with vector calculus, but definitely not only with elementary calculus. But with elementary calculus it's possible to derive a simple special case of Ampere's circuital law, namely that for a closed path around a current carrying wire. There may be other (highly-symmetric) configurations for which Ampere's law can be derived from Biot-Savart, but I can't think of any at present.

For the case of the current carrying wire, the magnetic field at a distance r from the wire can be found by Biot-Savart law and is given as \frac{I}{2\pi r}. This itself can be derived by considering a particular setup, that of a current flowing upwards in a wire aligned along the z-axis towards z. By the Biot-Savart law:

d\textbf{B} = \frac{\mu_0 Id\textbf{L} \times \textbf{r}}{4\pi r^3}.
For this setup, d\textbf{L} = dz \textbf{k} \ \mbox{and} \ \textbf{r} = x\textbf{i} + y\textbf{j} + z\textbf{k} and this makes the numerator of the dB expression (x\textbf{j} - y\textbf{i})dz by the cross product.

So integrating the above from -infinity to +infinity along the z-axis of current flow gives:

\frac{I\mu_0}{4\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{-y}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}} \textbf{i} + \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{x}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}} \textbf{j}

This reduces to the following after substituting for the limits of the integral expression:

\frac{I\mu_0}{2\pi} \left( -\frac{y}{x^2+y^2} \textbf{i} + \frac{x}{x^2+y^2} \textbf{j}\right).

And the magnitude of the vector to be \frac{I\mu_0}{2\pi r}, where r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}.

So, with this one can prove Ampere's circuital law for the simple case of a current carrying wire. Starting with \oint \textbf{B} \cdot d\textbf{r}, note that the value of magnetic flux density does not change with the line integral around the wire at the same radius, so that means we can take B outside of the integral and the closed path integral reduces to the circumference of a circle about the wire. So this means that \textbf{B} \oint d\textbf{r} = B (2\pi r). And with the expression for B as derived above, \frac{I\mu_0}{2\pi r} 2 \pi r = I\mu_0.

You can find a clearer and better derivation for this in any introductory physics textbook.
 
anantchowdhary said:
Is it possible to derive Ampere's Law(circuital) using the Biot Savart Law and elementary calculus?
Thanks
Take the curl of the integral in the B-S law.
If done, carefully, this gives Maxwell's eqaution for the curl of B (for static fields).
Applying Stokes' theorem to the curl of B gives Ampere's law.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top