Measuring Moment of Inertia of RC Helicopter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring the moment of inertia of a remote-controlled helicopter around its principal axes at the center of gravity. The original poster seeks an experimental setup and method, referencing equations that relate angular accelerations to moments and moments of inertia. They propose rotating the helicopter on a table but express concerns about accurately measuring torque if the table rotates at a constant rate. The helicopter will be equipped with gyros and accelerometers for data collection. Additional resources, including papers from Space Electronics, are recommended for further guidance on measuring these properties.
williamshipman
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi guys.

I am trying to measure the moment of inertia of a remote controlled helicopter about its 3 principle axes at the centre of gravity. In all of the literature I have read relating to this project, everyone just glosses over this part. What I need to figure out is an experimental setup and method.

I have the following 3 equations that relate the moment about each axis and the 3 angular velocities to the angular accelerations. All of these equations are with respect a fixed axis system centred at the centre of gravity.
p_dot=M_x/I_xx -rq/I_xx (I_zz-I_yy )
q_dot=M_y/I_yy -rp/I_yy (I_xx-I_zz )
r_dot=M_z/I_zz -pq/I_zz (I_yy-I_xx )

p_dot, q_dot and r_dot are the angular accelerations. The angular velocities are p (roll), q (pitch) and r (yaw). The moments about each axis are M_x, M_y and M_z and the moments of inertia are I_xx, I_yy and I_zz.

So far, I have thought of putting the helicopter on a table and rotating it about one axis, then repeating the procedure for the other 2 axes. This has the small problem that, if the table rotates at a constant rate, the dot terms are zero. If the table is accelerating, then this could work but how would I know what the torque applied to the helicopter is?

I forgot to mention, the helicopter will be fitted with gyros to measure the orientation and accelerometers for the linear and angular accelerations. Thanks for your help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


It's not the easiest way to do things, but it is definitely doable. I guess it all boils down to how accurate you want to get. You can measure the principal axes via the method in the attached article. The off diagonal elements you can then calculate.

Go to this thread for the article:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=222753
 


Thanks very much for the info Fred, that was exactly what I was looking for.
 


Its now a few months later and I thought I'd post this. FredGarvin gave a paper from Space Electronics in the other thread he links to. Space Electronics has published a number of other papers on their website that explain how to measure various properties, like the moment of inertia and center of gravity. Anyone who is struggling with such work should look at their website http://www.space-electronics.com" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top