Question on Proportionate spheres (Help )

  • Thread starter Thread starter aquirk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spheres
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the weight of an object on Jupiter based on its mass and radius compared to Earth. The weight is proportional to the planet's mass and inversely proportional to the square of its radius. Given that Jupiter's mass is 320 times that of Earth and its radius is 11 times greater, the formula simplifies to determine the weight of an apple, which weighs 1.0 N on Earth. By applying the proportionality, the apple would weigh approximately 29.0 N on Jupiter. The conversation emphasizes using the provided values directly in the formula without needing to understand the underlying derivation for Earth’s weight.
aquirk
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Question on Proportionate spheres (Help!)

A spherical balloon is partially blown up and its surface area is measured. More air is then added, increasing the volume of the balloon. If the surface area of the balloon expands by a factor of 9.4 during this procedure, by what factor does the radius of the balloon change?

If the radius of a sphere is increased by 12 %, by what factor does its surface area increase?
- By what percentage does its surface area increase?
- By what factor does the sphere's volume increase?
- By what percentage does the sphere's volume increase?

The weight of an object at the surface of a planet is proportional to the planet's mass and inversely proportional to the square of the radius of the planet. Jupiter's radius is 11 times Earth's and its mass is 320 times Earth's. An apple weighs 1.0 N on Earth. How much would it weigh on Jupiter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


aquirk said:
A spherical balloon is partially blown up and its surface area is measured. More air is then added, increasing the volume of the balloon. If the surface area of the balloon expands by a factor of 9.4 during this procedure, by what factor does the radius of the balloon change?

If the radius of a sphere is increased by 12 %, by what factor does its surface area increase?
- By what percentage does its surface area increase?
- By what factor does the sphere's volume increase?
- By what percentage does the sphere's volume increase?

The weight of an object at the surface of a planet is proportional to the planet's mass and inversely proportional to the square of the radius of the planet. Jupiter's radius is 11 times Earth's and its mass is 320 times Earth's. An apple weighs 1.0 N on Earth. How much would it weigh on Jupiter?

What are your thoughts on a solution?
 


I figured out the first few questions, I just have the one left about how much the object would weigh on Jupiter. I understand the proportional/inversely proportional aspects to the problem, I just don't get how you use them together to get the weight on Jupiter. I don't even get how they use the two to get the weight on Earth.
 


aquirk said:
I figured out the first few questions, I just have the one left about how much the object would weigh on Jupiter. I understand the proportional/inversely proportional aspects to the problem, I just don't get how you use them together to get the weight on Jupiter. I don't even get how they use the two to get the weight on Earth.

From the statement of the problem:
The weight of an object at the surface of a planet is proportional to the planet's mass and inversely proportional to the square of the radius of the planet. Jupiter's radius is 11 times Earth's and its mass is 320 times Earth's. An apple weighs 1.0 N on Earth. How much would it weigh on Jupiter?

It says the weight is proportional to the mass of the planet. That would mean the bigger the mass the greater the weight right?
Then it says that the weight is also inversely proportional to the square of the radius of the planet.

So if you put that in a formula it would look like:

Weight \propto \frac{Planet Mass}{Radius^2}

So if your weight on Earth is 1N and the Planet Mass is 320 times greater and the Radius is 11 times greater then the apple will be ______ times greater?
 
Welcome to PF!

aquirk said:
I understand the proportional/inversely proportional aspects to the problem, I just don't get how you use them together to get the weight on Jupiter. I don't even get how they use the two to get the weight on Earth.

Hi aquirk! Welcome to PF! :smile:

That's the beauty of this dimension method …

you don't need to know how they use the two to get the weight on Earth! …

just follow LowlyPion's advice … take the figure they've given you for Earth, and plug it into the dimension equation. :smile:
 


an apple wieghs 1.0 N on Earth. set it up so you are multipling 320 by Earths planet mass divided by Earths Radius^2 multiplied by 11. the Earth Data cancels to 1.0 N so 320/11 is roughly 29.0 multiplied by 1.0 N we get that an apple wieghs 29.0 N on Jupiter.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top