Divergence in Polar Coordinates

neutrino2063
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Why is
\nabla\cdot\vec{A}=\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(rA_{r})+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}(A_{\theta})

Where
\vec{A}=A_{r}\hat{r}+A_{\theta}\hat{\theta}
And
\nabla=\hat{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}+\hat{\theta}\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}
Instead of just:

\nabla\cdot\vec{A}=\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(A_{r})+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}(A_{\theta})
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the unit vectors are actually functions of position in cylindrical coordinates. This means all the derivative in the gradient operator act not only on the components of a particular vector, but also the unit vectors themselves.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top