Analyzing an Elastic Collision Between Two Hockey Pucks

  • Thread starter Thread starter nsaZn23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
An elastic collision between two hockey pucks is analyzed, where one puck moves at 0.43 m/s and collides with a stationary puck. After the collision, the first puck is deflected at 35° with a speed of 0.36 m/s. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using conservation of momentum rather than energy for solving the problem. Participants discuss breaking down the velocities into components to find the speed and direction of the second puck. Ultimately, one participant successfully solves the problem after seeking clarification on the approach.
nsaZn23
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A hockey puck moving at 0.43 m/s collides elastically with another puck that was at rest. The pucks have equal mass. The first puck is deflected 35° to the right and moves off at 0.36 m/s. Find the speed and direction of the second puck after the collision.


Homework Equations


1/2mv2 + 1/2mv2 = 1/2mv2 + 1/2mv2
momentum initial = momentum final


The Attempt at a Solution


no idea
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by putting the equations for initial momentum and final momentum.

m \vec{v_{1}} + m \vec{0} = m \vec{v_{1}}' + m \vec{v_{2}}'

then set up the KE equations too
 
nsaZn23 said:

Homework Statement


A hockey puck moving at 0.43 m/s collides elastically with another puck that was at rest. The pucks have equal mass. The first puck is deflected 35° to the right and moves off at 0.36 m/s. Find the speed and direction of the second puck after the collision.


Homework Equations


1/2mv2 + 1/2mv2 = 1/2mv2 + 1/2mv2
momentum initial = momentum final


The Attempt at a Solution


no idea

This would be an elastic collision.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision#One-dimensional_Newtonian

You would want to focus on the conservation of momentum, not the conservation of energy.

In this regard you need to identify the components of the x,y velocity and add them separately to determine the components of the one you don't know. Then recombine the components to give the right answer.
 
uhhh I'm bad at physics can you elaborate?
 
nsaZn23,

are you familiar with vectors?

the problem basically is

v_{1} \vec{i} + \vec{0} = v_{1}_{x}' \vec{i} + v_{1}_{y}' \vec{j} + v_{2}_{x}' \vec{i} + v_{2}_{y}' \vec{j}
 
Yeah,

I see that Mass X Velocity initial1 + Mass X Velocity initial2 = Mass X Velocity Final1 + Mass X Velocity Final2.

nevermind, i figured out how to do the problem, thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top