Calculating effective nuclear charge

  • Thread starter Thread starter escryan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Nuclear
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the effective nuclear charge (Zeff) for beryllium (Be) using its ionization energy of 899.4 kJ/mol. The formula Zeff = Z - S was initially applied, yielding Zeff = 2, but there is uncertainty about incorporating ionization energy into the calculation. Participants note that the relationship between ionization energy and effective nuclear charge suggests a more complex calculation may be necessary. Confusion arises regarding the units for Zeff, particularly when considering the transition from kJ/mol to mol-1. The thread emphasizes the importance of understanding how to correctly apply the equations and interpret the units involved in these calculations.
escryan
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If ionization energy is 899.4 kJ/mol for Be, what is the effective nuclear charge?

Homework Equations


Zeff = Z - S

E=RH(Z2/n2) ??
E=RH(Zeff2/n2)??

The Attempt at a Solution



My attempted solution was subbing into
Zeff = Z - S
Zeff = 4 - 2
= 2

But I suspect that is wrong... because why ionization energy is given.. so shouldn't it be used in the calculation?

And somewhere I think I read that "S" was supposed to be a "constant" of some sort, and I just subbed 2 in because I thought that it was the number of electrons in the first orbital ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One of the equations you listed contains both ionization energy and effective nuclear charge, why don't you use it?
 
Ah..
So subbing in values
E=899.4 kJ/mol
RH=2.178 x 10-21 kJ
n=1

I get Z2eff= 4.129 x 10 23 mol

How does one get to the units/value of Z2eff after this?
 
Ionization energy was per mole, not per molecule.
 
Oops, just noticed that "Z2eff= 4.129 x 10 23 mol " should actually read "Z2eff= 4.129 x 10 23 mol-1 "

I think that the italicized part is what confuses me the most -- what are the units for this portion? I'm going to take a guess that it is currently molecules/mol, but if so, is this always the case whenever expressing a value and the unit mol-1?

Like for this example, what was given was in kJ/mol. When the kJs were cancelled, what resulted was just mol-1...
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top