What is an inertial frame of reference?

AI Thread Summary
An inertial frame of reference is defined as a frame where Newton's first law of motion holds true, meaning that a particle at rest or moving at constant velocity experiences no net force. Inertial frames are characterized by the absence of acceleration; thus, if a frame is accelerating, it cannot be considered inertial. The discussion highlights that inertia is the property that allows objects to maintain their state of motion unless acted upon by an external force. A practical example illustrates that even if an object appears stationary in one frame, it may appear to change velocity in an accelerating frame. Overall, understanding inertial frames is crucial for applying Newtonian physics accurately.
alpha372
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is an inertial frame of reference?


Homework Equations


-A particle at rest or moving at a constant velocity in an inertial frame of reference implies that the sum of the forces acting on the particle is zero
-The tendency of a body to keep moving once it is set in motion results from a property called inertia.


The Attempt at a Solution


My best guess is that it is a location in space where internal or external forces are not acting on it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why guess? That's just asking for a definition. You can probably look it up in the index of your textbook.
 
My text just says, "A frame of reference in which Newton's first law is valid is called an inertial frame of reference." But, it doesn't give specific if then conditionals on the the phrase "in which Newton's first law is valid." For instance, it doesn't say, Newton's first law is valid if... or, "Newton's first law is not valid if..."

Although, with a bit more reading, the text seems to hint that a frame which is accelerating is not an inertial frame of reference. I would like some verification for this, because the book doesn't just come right out and say it; I tend to have a preference for outright definitions.
 
A simple phrasing of Newton's first law is "Objects will not change velocity unless acted upon by a force". Velocity is relative to your frame of reference.

Suppose you have a brick just floating there in space, light years from the nearest gravity well, for all intents and purposes unaffected by outside forces. Further suppose you arbitrarily accelerate your frame of reference to 200 miles per hour in some random direction. The brick has now changed velocity in your frame, despite not having been acted upon by a force.

So, no, accelerating frames are not inertial. As for definitions, Newton defined inertial frames as frames not accelerating relative to "the fixed stars", but that formulation is a bit out of date.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top