Lorentz Contraction with small velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating Lorentz contraction for a car traveling at 30 m/s, with a rest length of 5.0 m. Participants highlight the challenge of computing the contraction due to the low velocity, which results in a value close to 1 when using the standard formula. They discuss the need for a binomial expansion to approximate the contraction effectively, leading to a simplified formula. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recalling binomial approximations from prior lessons to solve the problem accurately. Overall, the thread provides insights into applying theoretical concepts to practical calculations in special relativity.
benji55545
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


About how many femtometers shorter than its rest length is the length of a car measured in the ground frame if the car is traveling at 30 m/s in that frame? Assume for the sake of argument that the car's rest length is 5.0 m. Remember that 1 fm = 10^-15 m.


Homework Equations


L=Lr*\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}


The Attempt at a Solution



This is a pretty straight forward Lorentz contraction problem, but all attempts to actually calculate it fail because the velocity is so slow (1*10-7). How can I scale the numbers so solving 1-\beta^{2} doesn't just give me 1?

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It takes quite a bit of space (plus a masterful use of latex) to take you through the derivation of the "low velocity" formula. But it ends up as √(1-ß^2) ≈ 1-(0.5)ß^2.

The derivation involves going through a binomial expansion of the original formula. Do you recall doing this in class?
 
Thanks for the reply. We talked about the binomial approximation when we were learning about about the relationship between spacetime and proper time, but I didn't think to apply it in this case.
Thanks for the help.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top