Scalar & Vector: Differences & Direction

  • Thread starter Thread starter harshinig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scalar Vector
AI Thread Summary
Scalar quantities are defined by their magnitude alone, such as temperature or mass, while vector quantities include both magnitude and direction, like velocity or force. The discussion highlights confusion around the use of positive and negative signs in scalar quantities, emphasizing that these signs indicate value relative to a reference point rather than direction. For example, a temperature of +10°C and -10°C represents values on a scale without implying directional movement. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for correctly interpreting physical concepts. Clarity in definitions helps differentiate between how scalars and vectors are utilized in scientific contexts.
harshinig
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
what are the differences between scalar and vector quantities?
why do we use */-in specifying direction of any scalar quantity
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should find the answer to this by looking up the definitions of scalar and vector.
The second sentence doesn't make any sense to me. You will see what I mean when you read those definitions!
 
I think that the second sentence may be refer to scalar quantities such as temperature, where you can have +10'C but also -10'C.

In a case like this, the signs don't declare the "direction" of the temperature - just its value on a scale with reference to an agreed zero point.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top