Thermal Diffusivity: Steel vs. Titanium

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skyeagle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermal
AI Thread Summary
Thermal diffusivity is defined as the ratio of thermal conductivity to the product of density and heat capacity, influencing how quickly a material responds to temperature changes. Steel has a higher thermal diffusivity (20.11 mm²/s) compared to titanium (8.85 mm²/s), suggesting that temperature differences propagate faster in steel. However, melting involves complex interactions, including external heat sources and phase changes, making direct comparisons based solely on diffusivity misleading. Lower thermal diffusivity does not necessarily equate to faster melting, as demonstrated by ceramics, which have low diffusivity but do not melt quickly. Thus, the relationship between thermal diffusivity and melting behavior is not straightforward and requires consideration of additional material properties.
Skyeagle
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, need your help on the below question:

There is this parameter known as thermal diffusivity.

Thermal Diffusivity = k/ p*C, where k= thermal conductivity, p=density and C= Heat Capacity.

The thermal diffusivity value for Steel is 20.11 um^-2/s (melting point at 1810K) and the value for titanium is 8.85 um^-2/s (melting point at 1933K).

Can I say that in this case, titanium will melt faster than steel because the heat that is mostly absorbed by the titanium will cause the melting, whereas steel melt slower because the heat is conducted away?

Or in another words, any material with a lower thermal diffusivity value will melt faster?

Thanks and Best Rgds
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
We can say for sure that a temperature difference will propagate faster through steel than titanium.

However, melting involves an externally applied heat source and a phase change, so things get more complicated. Are you assuming constant temperature, constant heat flux, or another boundary condition to enforce melting? This would affect the melting comparison. Also, the heat must propagate through the molten material, so the properties of liquid steel and titanium are also relevant. Finally, the heat of fusion of both metals is also relevant, as this energy must be carried away through the liquid phase.

I don't believe one can reach a conclusion based on information given, unfortunately.

Incidentally, your values are off by six orders of magnitude; shouldn't the units be mm2/s?
 
Skyeagle said:
Thermal Diffusivity = k/ p*C, where k= thermal conductivity, p=density and C= Heat Capacity.

The thermal diffusivity value for Steel is 20.11 um^-2/s (melting point at 1810K) and the value for titanium is 8.85 um^-2/s (melting point at 1933K).

Can I say that in this case, titanium will melt faster than steel because the heat that is mostly absorbed by the titanium will cause the melting, whereas steel melt slower because the heat is conducted away?
The heat is not conducted away, it is needed to increase the temperature needed to melt the material. Melting has to do with characteristics of the material, such as how the molecules acomodate and form crystals. The way the crystals are arrenged has to do with the energy requiered for them to move among them (Melting).

Skyeagle said:
Or in another words, any material with a lower thermal diffusivity value will melt faster?


Ceramics has lower thermal diffusivity and does not melt faster! Such as the ones used in the space shuttle that are used to protect it from the heat when they reenter the atmosphere.
 
Thermal diffusivity measures the ability to conduct thermal energy relative to its ability to store thermal energy (Incropera and DeWitt). It basically tels you how quickly a material responds to changes in their thermal enviroment. It does not say anything about the melting point.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top