When will two spheres with variable forces make contact?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for two 1 kg spheres, initially 10 meters apart, to make contact under mutual gravitational attraction. The gravitational force between the spheres increases as they approach each other, necessitating the use of calculus to solve the problem. The approach involves setting up differential equations based on Newton's second law and integrating to find the time until contact. The final expression for the time T is derived using integration techniques, leading to a numerical estimate of approximately 2,917,196 seconds. The discussion highlights the complexity of gravitational interactions and the mathematical methods required to analyze them.
DocZaius
Messages
365
Reaction score
11
Firstly, I'd like to announce that this is not a homework question, it is an example of a problem I thought up to illustrate what I have trouble with:

Two spheres, each with a mass of 1 kg and a radius of 1 meter, lie in space. Their centers are 10 meters apart. When will they make contact?

Now obviously the initial force acting on each sphere is easily calculable from the gravity equation. But an infinitesmall period of time after they have moved towards each other, their distance apart will have changed, and the force acting on each sphere will increase. Not only are they accelerating towards each other because of gravity, but they are also increasing their acceleration as they get closer to each other.

I am sure calculus will be involved and that's fine. What's the simplest method that you would use to solve a problem where force changes with distance/time?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you might do it like this:
Call the spheres A and B, and let the origin of the coordinate system lie at the midpoint of the line segment defined by their centres.
Calling the sphere centres' positions as functions of time x_{A}(t),x_{B}(t), x_{A}(0)=-5,x_{B}(0)=5[/tex], respectively, we define the distance function between them as:<br /> D(t)=x_{B}(t)-x_{A(t), D(0)=D_{0}=10<br /> <br /> Setting up Newton&#039;s 2.law for both, we get, with unit masses:<br /> \frac{d^{2}x_{A}}{dt^{2}}=\frac{G}{D^{2}}, \frac{d^{2}x_{B}}{dt^{2}}=-\frac{G}{D^{2}}<br /> whereby the equation for d(t) is readily derived:<br /> \frac{d^{2}D}{dt^{2}=-\frac{2G}{D^{2}} (*)<br /> <br /> We assume that the initial velocities are 0, i.e, \frac{dD}{dt}\mid_{t=0}=0<br /> <br /> Let us multiply (*) with dD/dt:<br /> \frac{d^{2}D}{dt^{2}}\frac{dD}{dt}=-\frac{2G}{D^{2}}\frac{dD}{dt}<br /> <br /> Integrating both sides from t=0 to some arbitrary t-value, taking due notice of the initial conditions, yields:<br /> \frac{1}{2}(\frac{dD}{dt})^{2}=\frac{2G}{D}-\frac{2G}{D_{0}}<br /> <br /> multiplying with two, taking the square root and remembering that D(t) will be decreasing, we get the diff. eq:<br /> \frac{dD}{dt}=-\sqrt{\frac{4G}{D_{0}}\sqrt{\frac{D_{0}-D}{D}}<br /> This is a separable diff.eq; we write:<br /> \sqrt{\frac{D}{D_{0}-D}}dD=-\sqrt{\frac{4G}{D_{0}}dt<br /> <br /> We now remember that when they spheres make contact, D(T)=2, where T is the time we&#039;re looking for!<br /> <br /> Thus, we get the equation for T, integrating both sides:<br /> \int_{10}^{2}\sqrt{\frac{D}{D_{0}-D}}dD=-\sqrt{\frac{4G}{D_{0}}T, or, equivalently:<br /> T=\sqrt{\frac{D_{0}}{4G}}\int_{2}^{10}\sqrt{\frac{D}{D_{0}-D}}dD (**)<br /> <br /> In order to crack that integral, let us set:<br /> u=\sqrt{\frac{D}{D_{0}-D}}\to{D}=D_{0}-\frac{D_{0}}{1+u^{2}}<br /> Thus, dD=\frac{D_{0}2u}{(1+u^{2})^{2}}du<br /> The limits are D=10\to{u}=\infty,D=2\to{u}=\frac{1}{2}<br /> We thereby get the expression for T in u:<br /> T=D_{0}\sqrt{\frac{D_{0}}{G}}\int_{\frac{1}{2}}^{\infty}\frac{u^{2}du}{(1+u^{2})^{2}}<br /> <br /> This can quite readily be solved by standard techniques.
 
Last edited:
I will guess 92,249.8 seconds from numerical integration.

edit: I left out a constant. I get 2,917,196 seconds.
 
Last edited:
Well, we can make it a bit more explicit than that, Bob S!

We have:
\int\frac{1}{1+u^{2}}du=\frac{u}{1+u^{2}}+\int\frac{2u^{2}}{(1+u^{2})^{2}}du, by doing integration by parts.
Therefore, we get:
\int\frac{u^{2}}{(1+u^{2})^{2}}du=\frac{1}{2}(\arctan(u)-\frac{u}{1+u^{2}})+C

whereby we get:
T=\frac{10^{\frac{3}{2}}}{2\sqrt{G}}(\frac{\pi}{2}-\arctan(\frac{1}{2})+\frac{2}{5})
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top