Is the Sum of Two Periodic Functions Always Periodic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cemre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Periodic
AI Thread Summary
The sum of two periodic functions is generally periodic if their periods have a least common multiple. However, if the least common multiple does not exist, as in the case of sin(x) and sin(pi*x), the sum may not be periodic. Specifically, for the sum to be periodic, the ratio of their periods must be rational. This means that if the periods are incommensurable, the resulting function may not exhibit periodic behavior. Therefore, the periodicity of the sum depends on the relationship between the periods of the individual functions.
Cemre
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello,

correct me if I am wrong, but as far as I know if 2 functions f(x) and g(x) are periodic with Tf and Tg periods. f(x)+g(x) is also periodic with least common multiple of Tf and Tg.

But; what if that least common multiple doesn't exist?

is "sin(x) + sin(pi*x)" periodic?

there is no x ( except for zero ) which makes both sin(x) and sin(pi*x) zero at the same x.

Regards.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


The quotient of the periods, Tf/Tg has to be rational in order for the sum to be periodic.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top