Calculating the potential of a uniformily charged spherical solid

noblegas
Messages
266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the potential inside and outside uniformily charged spherical solid whose radius R and whose total charge is q.use infinity as your reference point

Homework Equations


V=-\int E* dl

gauss law = \int E *da=q/\epsilon_ 0

The Attempt at a Solution



This should be easy. Inside a solid sphere, E=0 so the potential inside sphere is zero. The electric field of a sphere is : E_sphere=(1/(4*\pi*\epsilon_ 0))*q/R^2 => V=-(1/(4*\pi*\epsilon_ 0))*q/R. Hmm... my solution is too easy; I know this solution was worked out in one of the examples found in my textbooks. Should I apply gauss law I take into account that dq=\rho*d\tau=\sigma*da where d\tau=(4/3)*\pi R^3andda=4*\pi*r^2 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electric field is only zero inside a conducting sphere. This is because all the charge migrates to the surface and it acts likes a hollow charged shell. In the question it does not say the sphere is conducting, it says it is uniformly charged. Therefore it must be acting as an insulating sphere, because a conducting sphere is not uniformly charged. Work it out assuming there is a field inside and you will get the right answer.

Also the potential inside a conducting sphere won't be zero, it will assume the value of the potential at the surface of the sphere.
 
Kalvarin said:
The electric field is only zero inside a conducting sphere. This is because all the charge migrates to the surface and it acts likes a hollow charged shell. In the question it does not say the sphere is conducting, it says it is uniformly charged. Therefore it must be acting as an insulating sphere, because a conducting sphere is not uniformly charged. Work it out assuming there is a field inside and you will get the right answer.

Also the potential inside a conducting sphere won't be zero, it will assume the value of the potential at the surface of the sphere.

I think I got it; for r>R, E(4*pi*r^2)=rho*(4/3*pi*R^3)/epilison_0 => and for R<r E(4*pi*r^2)==rho*(4/3*pi*R^3)/epilison_0
 
Last edited:
Yep that looks right.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top