Total energy of air, does it include pressure?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between drag force, pressure differentials, and the total energy of air in the context of two buses traveling at different speeds. It explores whether the work done on the air is solely related to the kinetic energy change or if pressure energy also plays a significant role. The example of two buses, one with a streamlined design, raises questions about the comparison of drag forces and energy calculations based on immediate versus exit velocities. Participants consider how pressure drag and shear frictional drag contribute to the overall aerodynamic power consumed. Ultimately, the discussion seeks to clarify the interplay between kinetic and pressure energy in the context of aerodynamic drag.
rcgldr
Homework Helper
Messages
8,923
Reaction score
675
I'll ask this in the form of an example. A bus is traveling at some speed and there is no wind. The bus experiences a drag force related to the pressure differential at the front and rear of the bus. Most of the divergence in pressure from ambient occurs behind the bus, where the air is accelerated forward to fill in what would otherwise be a void.

The power consumption related to drag should be this drag force times speed (this is a no wind condition, so ground speed = air speed).

The "exit velocity" for each tiny amount of mass of air affected by the bus it that bit of air's velocity at the moment and place where it's pressure returns to ambient. Will the work done on the air by the bus be equal to the integral sum of 1/2 mass (exit_velocity)2?

The velocities in the immediate vicinity of the bus will be different than the exit velocities. The higher pressure areas will have velocities lower than exit velocity and vice versa. Is the work done on the air instead related to these velocities as opposed to the exit velocities?

Now to reask the original question, is the work done only related to the kinetic energy change of the air, or is the pressure energy of the air also a factor?

another example

Take a second bus with a streamlined tail section to reduce the drag. Bus2 travels faster so that it consumes the same amount of aerodynamic power as bus1 :

drag2 speed2 = drag1 speed1

Will the integral sum of the 1/2 mass (immediate_velocites)2 or 1/2 mass (exit_velocities)2 (or maybe both?) be the same for bus1 and bus2?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The air drag on an object is a combination of pressure drag (component of force normal to surface of object) and shear frictional drag (component of force tangent to surface of object).
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top